The actions of brahmins, kshatriyas, vaishyas, and shudras, Parantapa, have been apportioned, set out by a division of one from another, by the qualities born of their own nature. 'Their own nature' is the Lord's own power (prakrti), the maya made of the three qualities; the qualities have their source in that, and so are 'born of nature'; and by these the actions, tranquillity and the rest, are apportioned to brahmins and the others. Or else: the source of the brahmin's nature is the quality of sattva; the source of the kshatriya's nature is rajas with sattva subordinate; the source of the vaishya's nature is rajas with tamas subordinate; the source of the shudra's nature is tamas with rajas subordinate, this being seen in the four from the marks of calm, of lordliness, of enterprise, and of dullness. Or again: the disposition formed by acts done in earlier births, becoming manifest in the present birth as turned toward its own effect, is one's nature; the qualities have that for their source, since the rising of the qualities cannot be without a cause, and 'nature' is named as that particular cause. So, by the qualities sattva, rajas, and tamas, which spring from nature, the actions, tranquillity and the rest, are apportioned in conformity with their effect. It may be objected: the actions of brahmins and the rest, tranquillity and so on, are apportioned by scripture, enjoined by it; how then are they said to be apportioned by the qualities sattva and the rest? This is no fault. Scripture too apportions the actions, tranquillity and the rest, to brahmins and the others only with regard to the particular qualities, sattva and the rest, that they have, not without regard to the qualities; so even the actions apportioned by scripture are said to be apportioned by the qualities. What then are those actions? The Lord says.
Contemporary English rendering of the Sanskrit bhāṣya, pending scholar review.