For the object of each sense, in the sound and the other objects of all the senses, there is passion toward the liked and aversion toward the disliked; so, for each sense-object, passion and aversion are bound to arise. Here is stated the scope of human effort and of the meaning of scripture: one who has set out on the meaning of scripture should not, from the very first, fall under the sway of passion and aversion. For the nature of a man, led by passion and aversion, sets him to its own work, and then there is the abandonment of his own duty and the taking up of another's. But when one governs passion and aversion by their opposites, then the man becomes one whose vision is governed by scripture, not one under the sway of nature. Therefore one should not come under the sway of these two, for they are this man's waylayers, the makers of obstacles on the road of the highest good, like robbers on a path. Now, one impelled by passion and aversion thinks 'even the meaning of scripture is otherwise; another's duty too, being a duty, is to be carried out'. That is wrong.
Contemporary English rendering of the Sanskrit bhāṣya, pending scholar review.