He hates not illumination, the effect of sattva, nor engagement, the effect of rajas, nor delusion, the effect of tamas, when they have well arisen, come up with the full character of objects, with the thoughts 'a tāmasa cognition has arisen in me, and by it I am deluded', 'a rājasa engagement, full of pain, has arisen in me, and by rajas I have been set in motion, shaken from my own form, and alas, this is for me a falling from the standing in my own form', 'the sāttvika quality, of the nature of illumination, binds me by making me discerning and by attaching me to happiness'; he does not, as one who sees wrongly, hate them so. And as the sāttvika and other kinds of man long for the effects of sattva and the rest, having shone them upon himself, once they have ceased, the one who has gone beyond the qualities does not so long for them when they have ceased. This is not a mark perceptible to another; rather, since it is perceptible to one's own self, this mark is for one's own sake alone, for another does not see one's aversion or longing toward one's own self. Now the answer to the question what the conduct of the one who has gone beyond the qualities is.
Contemporary English rendering of the Sanskrit bhāṣya, pending scholar review.