Q: Father, I just felt to come up. Not sure if there is a question.
A: What is still left to be done?
[Silence]
If time was to stop, would you be disappointed? ‘Oh, there is so much left and time has stopped.’ [Chuckles] So, actually, time has stopped for You in Reality. You are not subject to time.
Then does something force you to attach YourSelf to that which is subject to time? We can say it’s kind of a force of habit (in a way). That’s the only thing, isn’t it? Once you see that You are this unchanging One, then this is the end of time. Because time applies only to change. Now, what is your truest reference point? That which is changing? Or That which is not changing?
[Silence]
What do I mean by ‘truest reference point’? Some Sage said ‘I am none of this and I am all of this, but in unequal measure because I am always none of this and only all of this only when I dance.’ So, when your Existence comes up (when You Are ‘I Am’) then all of this dance is there. Before that, any trouble?
Q: When I am in deep sleep, there is no trouble.
A: Then, automatically upon waking, is there trouble?
Q: No.
A: So, what are the prerequisites that are needed for there to be trouble?
Q: Being has to be there. Then, it could be memory comes up or something comes up or some appearance.
A: So, let’s do one thing. Let’s presume you just woke up from sleep; Being just came. Now, tell me how trouble can start.
Q: Belief in some appearance. That’s the only way I can pick up trouble.
A: Now, he beauty of belief (or thankfully, we can say) the belief cannot operate on most appearances. It only operates on one particular appearance. On a perception (just in the perception itself) there is nothing to believe or not believe. This is an important point because it can feel like ‘I’m believing this realm of appearances.’ But just in the appearance itself, without interpretation, there is nothing to believe. So, you can only believe this voice which is the voice of concepts, voice of interpretation, voice of judgment. So, if left unjudged (this appearance, if left unjudged) can you have any trouble?
Q: No.
A: So, an unjudged life is a beautiful life. But the life full of judgment is like a living hell. But the good news is that you don’t even have to have a process to be rid of judgment because Right Now, You are like this. So, doubt is a judgment, proclamation is a judgment, guilt is a judgment, resentment is a judgment, regret is a judgment; all these are just judgments. They are not needed for you Existence, are they? So, without a judgment, is there somewhere to go?
Q: So, I will tell you how the mechanics kind of works here, Father. I think the confusion becomes about the ‘I’. There is such a habit to attach the ‘I’ to the appearance. It is so automatic, Father.
A: If you buy that then we are in trouble already. Let’s look at the notion of ‘automatic.’ So, now automatically attach something to the ‘I.’
Q: But it’s not that automatic. [Laughter]
A: It’s not that automatic as the mind would like us to believe. It is like saying then that Consciousness itself has been held captive by the mind therefore, it is now stuck and automatically…
Then either you are something other than Consciousness. Or Consciousness has now become hostage to its own child called the mind. Both are not possible. You are only this Existence, this Being, this Consciousness. Now, really check whether it is automatic or as automatic as we think it is.
[Silence]
Q: [Inaudible]
A: Yes, in fact when you switch the perspective and say ‘Okay, I’m going to really check on how this belief is automatically picked up’ you see that it seems impossible to pick it up.
At best, what we can call it is a deeply ingrained habit, like an addiction or something like this. But we don’t even have to go so far because we are in Satsang. [Chuckles] We are in the ‘de-addiction center’ so all these addictions which seem so real also are being dealt with. So, before you take that first step of presuming that ‘Oh, it’s automatic and I get caught up in the ‘I’ and then I start seeking’ you will find that before that step, there is space; on the sense it is not original to you. If it was automatic truly, truly automatic then it would be Your original nature but it is not.
[Silence]
Who are you Now?
Q: The truest thing I can say right now is ‘I am Aware of everything that is showing up.’
A: ‘I am Aware of everything that is showing up.’ The ‘I’ that is Aware is which one? Because already you say it is the truest thing You can say; so already there must be some insight about this ‘I.’
Q: Yes this ‘I’ is … [Silence] I can’t say anything about this ‘I.’
A: But you did say that ‘I am Aware.’
Q: Yes …, other than the fact that it’s before all perception.
A: Before all perception. Okay, can we also say that this ‘I’ can never get fully caught up in this perception?
Q: Yes. Never gets caught up.
A: Then, which one does? Or does anyone? The one that does get caught up, is it this one?
Q: No.
A: And this is Your unchanging Reality. So then, all that is perceived, all that is changing, does it affect the Unchanging?
Q: Not at all.
A: So, is there freedom or bondage for this ‘I’?
Q: It knows freedom, or the concept of freedom and bondage, but doesn’t have that concept of Freedom.
A: Can it apply to Itself?
[Silence]
Q: No, can’t apply either freedom or bondage to Itself.
A: Then, if this is You, if this One is You, then is there another one of You?
Q: There is a pretense at times which gets somehow believed in and that’s the cause of suffering. But there is no other Me.
A: Even if the pretense is picked up, does something happen to You in Reality?
Q: No.
[Silence]
A: Now, can you lose This One? This real One? And can the pretense ever become real? [Silence] Why do we call it the pretense?
Q: Because I believe myself…, or there is a belief (I can’t say I believe) there is a belief that something is me.
A: What is a belief?
Q: What is a belief? So, the belief is…, I guess that the core belief…
A: But what does it mean: ‘belief’?
Q: To take it as mine (in a way). To say that it affects me.
A: What is this ‘to take it as mine’?
Q: Any appearance…, to have a meaning.
A: Yes. But the appearance itself is not selling its meaning. The appearance by itself is not even creating duality. So, the meaning comes from what?
Q: So, the meaning comes when …, it only seems to come when I assume the body position; that this is ‘me,’ this is ‘my body.’ I give myself a boundary.
A: But before assuming the body position; even to assume a body position is to give meaning or pretense. You see?
Q: Yes.
A: So, how do you come into this body position? Is it purely on basis of perception itself that makes you pick up the pretense of body?
Q: I think…, (I’ve been looking at this quite a bit). A few things. Any time I check, I’m not the body (when I check). But through habit, whether it’s a sensation (it can be pain, can be anything) and also this point of view; looking from the head. That’s something I’ve been looking at a lot. So, even I have been looking at closing my eyes, opening my eyes, closing my eyes, and it creates this illusion that I’m in the body; even though it’s so clear that with the sensations and everything that is happening: the body has to be in me, I can’t be in the body. But somehow this whole point of view does create a confusion or a habit.
A: Okay, just stay with this point of view (if you want to, you can move your head around) and see whether automatically there becomes a ‘you’ which is contained in this body.
Q: No.
A: So, not even with this visual perspective is there an individual sense of ‘you’ yet that is contained in the body.
Q: No.
A: It is not our perception, it is not these appearances, it is not the centrality of any perceiving. It seems to have a perspective it, it seems to come from here; [Points from eyes outward] not even that.
So, when you say ‘I have been looking’ …, who is this one?
Q: When I say ‘I have been looking’ it’s the false one.
A: Can the false one look?
Q: No, the false one cannot look, but when I speak about it or when I see that ‘Oh, I’ve been looking’ that’s the mind that’s playing.
A: It is the sense of individuality, which is again taking on this idea that it is the one that is perceiving.
Q: Yes.
A: But that is inherent only in the statement about it; not in the looking itself.
Can you not look? [Chuckles]
Q: No. Even in the deep sleep, I am looking.
A: Even when there is no perception, there is this Pure Witnessing.
Q: And that which was looking…, also this morning I was thinking ‘I am fully there in deep sleep.’ You know? ‘I just think I am not there. But I’m fully there in deep sleep.’ And now, the only thing that has changed is this Being for which all this has come. So, I must be the same that I was there in deep sleep witnessing all of this.
A: Now, this ‘must be’ can be a useful inference. But is it true when you check?
Q: Can you ask again?
A: Yes. You say ‘I am fully there in deep sleep and there is nothing missing. All of this comes when Being is here. In the play of my Existence, all of this comes. Therefore, I must be that same one still that was fully there.’ This ‘must be’ is an inference. So, like we were saying yesterday, ‘Use your inferences as possibilities for your insights.’
Can you check on the one that is Aware even of Your Existence?
Q: Yeah. That One is automatically Aware.
A: Can you step away from that One?
Q: Can’t step away from the looking.
A: Now, that One doesn’t want anything. Then? [Chuckles] What about this one?
Q: This one is trying to understand that One. [Laughter]
A: But this one is just the lawyer for the body/mind; just a representative of so-called limited entity. But You are not it. Neither are You being represented by it.
So, why any concern for what it wants? If I say to you ‘There is nobody sitting on the couch outside. Can you please go and give that nobody some water?’ Will you call me crazy or not?
(You might not…, because it’s me, you might not [Chuckles] but anybody else you would.)
So, this has been our lives. We have been catering to this nobody, the non-existent one. The one that is trying to understand the Self can never understand anything because it doesn’t exist.
Now, what all has this one wanted?
Q: Which one?
A: Okay, now let’s make it easier. What has the True One ever wanted?
Q: Nothing.
A: Nothing, you see? So, all this desire is whose?
Q: Of this.
A: This thirsty nobody. [Chuckles] Now, this thirsty nobody keeps sending you these emails (or you can say WhatsApp messages): ‘But what about when I am outside of Satsang?’ Who is it representing?
Q: The same thirsty nobody.
A: ‘What about my relationships?’
Q: The same one.
A: The same nobody. [Chuckles]
Q: I guess there is such an addiction to pick it up…
A: No. I used that word but now forget it. You don’t have an addiction. You have a Master.
Q: [Laughs] Okay.
A: Because sometimes in reinforcing that I have an affliction it can seem like I do. It’s all make- believe anyway. So, forget addiction.
Q: So, let’s see, Father. I don’t know what it is, I can’t even name it but there are some sensations and …
A: Let’s just say there are perceptions; that includes every appearance. And?
Q: I am not this perception. That is very clear. Almost in any situation, it’s very clear; except picking up still can happen but I am never those perceptions. But there is a thought that says ‘Why does this perception here not go? I don’t want this perception.’ And that causes almost all the suffering is that ‘Why there is this perception here? Why doesn’t it go?’
A: ‘Why is this perception here?’ means ‘I should not be facing this.’
Q: Yes, exactly.
A: So, the ‘I’ that should not be facing this one is which one?
Q: Is the false one.
A: Why questions are usually coming from a sense of self-righteousness about what the ‘What Is’ should be. ‘Oh, why is the world like that? Why is my body like this? Why are my relationships like this? Why is my money like this?’ It is actually saying ‘Why do I have to suffer?’ … ‘Why is the ‘What Is’ this way and I am not content? But all of this is the voice of the non-existent nobody.
Q: Yes.
A: That’s why you have now this master key to any ‘why?’ Why anything? It’s the Master’s Grace; Guru Kripa Kevalam.
‘Who?’ is the more important question.
[Silence]
One trick that the mind plays (I see that also often in Sangha members) is that ‘First let’s solve this for the pretend one, then I will talk about the Real One.’ This pretend one is a never-ending treadmill. You feel like you are running to solve something for this ‘me.’ Nothing is ever solved for this ‘me.’ Why? Because it doesn’t exist. It’s voice itself is the voice of the false. So, nothing has to be resolved for this one because this one doesn’t exist.
The mind will also tell you ‘But that gets in the way then. Until I solve it, that gets in the way.’ All nonsense! Because nothing can get in the way of All There Is. This is still the voice of a ‘me’ who is trying to get to something but the ‘me’ itself is non-existent.
Q: This is the ‘me’ asking all these questions also. If I really look at it, it’s just a very selfish desire to ask these questions.
A: Because what does it want?
Q: It just wants peace! Or I don’t know what it wants.
A: But peace is There, before wanting. [Chuckles]
Q: Exactly.
[Silence]
A: The perfume of Your natural notionless Existence IS this peace. So, it is giving you this false promise that once you have resolved it, then there will be peace…, which is just a false promise to distract You from the peace that is already there.
There is nowhere to get to. There is nothing to become.