Importance of Truthfulness - 23rd June 2016
Saar (Essence)
Ananta defines truthfulness as maintaining integrity by reporting direct experience with minimal mental interpretation, while avoiding the use of spiritual concepts to deny one's actual feelings or conditioning.
Integrity means reporting direct experience with as little mental interpretation as possible.
Do not use spiritual concepts like 'no doer' as an excuse for denial or bad behavior.
When communication comes from intuitive presence rather than mind, there is no grasping for outcomes.
intimate
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
Fatma says, "Father, reading 'End of Your World' and there is the whole portion about truthfulness that Adya has written about. How important is it to be truthful, especially to yourself, in this seeming journey? Can you talk about this, Father, a little bit?"
Various levels of truthfulness, isn't it? So the first level is the phenomenal level or the worldly level of truthfulness. When mostly we talk about being truthful, they're saying you're not lying about the appearance which came to you. So first is this worldly level. Your mother says, "Don't lie, don't lie," that now you came first in class or something. So in terms of the appearances playing out, one is that level of truthfulness: that this is what actually happened in my day-to-day life, and we are being truthful about that.
Now there is a deeper level of integrity which sages like Maharaj have spoken about very often. And this integrity means two aspects. One is using the minimum amount of words to just report on what is your direct experience, with as little mental interpretation as possible, you see. So when you're talking about integrity and truthfulness on this seeming spiritual path, you're talking about remaining as true to our direct experience as possible, knowing that words do not fully express the truth, but keeping them as empty of mental interpretation as possible. So this is the first part of integrity.
The second part of integrity is to not be in denial of what you are experiencing. Because very often what can happen is that the spiritual ego will deny it to yourself and to the rest of the world that some sense of suffering, some sense of resistance is coming, some ideas are still being believed in. So what will happen is that we might still be believing ideas about ourselves, and it could be very spiritual ideas like "I'm awake" and "I'm special" and "I am free" or something like this. Or it could be ideas about relationships or any other worldly phenomena. But actually, there is belief in them; there is conditioning about them. But what is happening is because we have heard concepts like "I am nothing" or "I am That" or "There is no doer," then we are just using concepts as denial for what is our direct experience.
So suffering is experienced; we resist even the resistance called suffering, thereby making it worse by being in denial of it, using some Advaita or spiritual concept, you see. So when we're speaking about truthfulness, they're talking about both these aspects: staying true to your direct experience of what is, and not denying that which seems to be contrary to your beliefs about who you are. So in this way, then, when we stay with this and we are open, you're not using concepts for any sort of denial. Because all the greatest Advaita sages actually have said also that Advaita can be the best excuse. Kabir himself says that Advaita is the best excuse for bad behavior because "there is no doer," you see. So in this way, then, this is not integrity. This is just—to use another of his terms—this is just being a spiritual jerk.
Read more (3 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
So if you're still coming from a mental concept, no matter how glorious or spiritual it might sound, you see, then it is not truthful. It is still in the realm of interpretation. Then the idea can come, "But I have to use the mind to communicate." Actually, ultimately that is not true, but I know where you are coming from. That's why I am saying, in as little terminology as possible, if you can point to your direct experience without being arrogant or falsely humble, then that qualifies as enough truthfulness.
So why did I say that ultimately even that is not true, that we have to use the mind to communicate? Because as you hand over this mind, as you give up this mind, then you'll find that there is the voice of your intuitive presence, the voice of the Satguru itself, which then can use the mouth. And how to tell the difference between these two? When it is coming from the mind, you can always smell some grasping, some need, wanting to be seen as something, wanting a particular outcome. But when it's coming from your intuitive presence, it is just sharing for the beauty of it. There is so much space, there's so much love and peace in that, and there is no concern about the outcome of it.
So as we give up on this mind, then you will find that this intuitive presence starts becoming available to us. Actually, all of us, from very early on, we have a very strong intuitive sense of what is true and what is not, you see. Even children know this; they can smell lies on themselves and on others also. So this sense of truthfulness is very, very native by design.
The Thread Continues
These satsangs touch the same silence.

On a similar theme
To Go Beyond the Usual Modes of Knowledge Is the Yoga of Knowledge (Gyana Yoga) - 25th February 2026
25 February 2026
Ananta emphasizes that spiritual life requires a total commitment to God's presence in the heart over the ego's...

On a similar theme
Allowing the Atma To Reveal the True Gyana (Self-Knowledge) - 20th February 2026
20 February 2026
Ananta guides seekers to move beyond the mind's 'checker guy' and conceptual labels by resting in the witnessing...

The following day
Who is this 'I' that cannot find the 'I'? - 27th June 2016
27 June 2016
Ananta deconstructs the seeker's conceptual reliance on memory and logic to find the 'I'. He guides the inquirer toward...