A Deep Sense of Ease - 27th April 2016
Saar (Essence)
Ananta guides seekers to abandon the need for mental confirmation and personal doership. He points toward the 'I don't know' state as a gateway to discovering one's true, non-personal nature beyond the ego's search for happiness.
I want to remove this cancer of personhood; my interest is not in giving you a temporary band-aid.
The wobbliness is the door to freedom; don't be fearful of the shakiness of the ego.
Right now, without any thought, who are you?
intimate
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
Kind of move in and take over, I don't know, or something. Even the confirmations we don't need. You see, sometimes it can happen that we look around, everything is just what it is, and the mind will come and they'll give you a confirmation: 'Yes, this is so nice. I'm so peaceful. Things are so happy now.' You see? And because we're used to these mental confirmations, something still relies on getting this, and this can lead to some sort of trouble. I'll tell you why. Because I am telling you that you are free now. You see, usually this is not accepted because we are waiting for a mental confirmation also to come. So he's saying that you're free now; what do you think the mind says? 'Oh, because he loves you, he's saying like this. Something so good... you're not there yet. I saw you outside just an hour ago and you were so angry.' And it was good, yes, yes, yes, it's mine, yes. Yeah, it's just an hour ago something that's happening like that.
Yes, because we are used to waiting for mental confirmation for everything, including our peace. So if you buy the thought, 'Oh, this is so nice, it's peaceful,' then we're just giving more and more value to this habit. We'll be giving meaning to this vision, adding to this energy. And I know it gives a bit—it feels a bit wobbly, you know? Yeah. But even the positive reinforcement or the affirmations which many practice, when we let go of even these positive affirmations, then it can seem a bit wobbly for a while. But this wobbliness is the door to freedom. A little bit of shakiness, if it is happening, it's good. They say that in yoga also, why they don't... this is yoga, your body starts shaking like this and don't worry about it, it's good. It's a target, you know? Some tendency, some conditioning, something from the past, it's adjusting, adjusting. So like this, shakiness can come, and if the shakiness is there, don't be fearful of it. Good. Mind itself will come and say, 'This is so scary. What's going to happen to you? You can't live without your happy thoughts. You've been affirming to yourself these happy things and that's what's kept you sane' or something, something. It can keep going on and on.
Yeah, yeah, you can say it has kept me sane up until now, yes. But the thing is, the problem is that it's always based on the pretense of 'you' which is not real. And the unreal, the more it is believed in, the more potential for suffering there is. So we cannot be believing our thoughts without picking up the idea that I exist personally. And at the root of all of this—and we must look at this together—at the root of all of it is the idea that 'I come to satsang to become a happy person' or a certain type of person, a peaceful person, a happy person. This is what I want. Now, if this idea still remains, then this idea is also going to be squeezed out of you. And this is not a happy squeezing, usually. Because we don't come to satsang, actually this type of satsang, to become happy people. Not to become shining happy people. We come to satsang to discover that which we truly are anyway, which cannot give meaning to this personal existence, although it is not in resistance to it. There's a beautiful allowing of all things to appear and disappear, but it cannot believe itself to be personal in any way. This is the end of suffering and it is here now.
So we reinforce the false idea with our belief, and whether belief is in happy or unhappy, the belief is always about a person which I believe myself to be. So what is going to happen is that for many of us, what happens is we come to satsang and initially it seems so happy. There is more space, there's more light, there's more peace, and it feels like this is good. But as you keep coming to satsang, you will keep encountering me asking you who you are. Who are you? Why are you? You keep encountering this question. And the mind will look: 'But I am happy. You are happy as a person now. Why do you keep asking who you are?' And something doesn't like it. There can be some fear which comes with this. Something can feel like some stability is getting shaken up. So that same satsang which seemed to give us some happiness, being spaced personally, is now seeming to attack this person directly. Seeming to attack this person because this person actually doesn't exist. And my interest is not in giving you some temporary band-aid. I don't want to give you some temporary band-aid until this is good, it feels good, okay. I also want to remove this cancer of personhood.
So sometimes it can seem very, very strong. It can seem very crushing to the ego even. And this also must be allowed to get released. But as long as we are believing two voices—one is the voice which speaks in satsang and the second is the voice of this false teacher that we've had inside our head for so long—then it will not be the end of the personhood; it will be the elongation of this so-called spiritual journey. And then a few years later you might be coming to satsang and saying, 'But I have been in satsang for a few years and nothing has happened. I haven't found the freedom. I haven't found myself to be this awareness that you speak about. I still feel like I am Lucia or I am a person.' If you listen to both these voices, then it is the stretching out of this non-existent journey. And it seems to be stretched out in time because right now, without any thought, who are you? That is what we are looking at.
Read more (20 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
And I don't know... when you ask them, oh, it's very beautiful. Don't be fearful of this 'I don't know.' That it is the coming from this 'I know I'm a person' though that 'I don't know' which seems more difficult in the spiritual journey for most. Because we are so convinced that we are this name and form, that to come to this 'I don't know' seems to stretch out for a long while for many. So if you're in this 'I don't know,' then don't be fearful of this because this is very beautiful. Now, this 'I don't know' the mind is very scared of. So it might try to give you some candy now, say, 'Come back, come back. I'm so bad, I have happy thoughts. Will you come? Come and this will rescue you.' In that, Guruji says the Maya, it says, 'I'll protect... I'm here to serve you, I'm here to protect you.' But you try leaving and it becomes very, very scary again. So don't buy into this candy which the mind is selling to you because it is scared of this 'I don't know.' It knows that from this 'I don't know,' a true recognition, a true realization will appear. So it has to take you away from 'I don't know who I am' back into personhood saying, 'Okay, but now I am a happy person and that's all I wanted.' It's not true right here, definitely, because the urge is within that the urge is to discover what we truly are, which is prior and beyond any sense of happiness or unhappiness. It is accepting, and in this accepting and allowing there can be a natural sense of peace and happiness, but it's not personal. There's nothing personal about this.
Just disconnect to what you've been saying and what you said about 'I was never born' or not. And that one's been driving me nuts all weekend because I have a direct experience of that we don't die because I communicate with people who were in the physical and who no longer physically here. I can talk to my father who's passed on for ten years and other people, I talked to them. So I know we don't die. I say, 'Alright, I don't die,' great. But the idea 'was never born' thing, oh my god, what's that about?
If you don't die, is it possible to be born actually? You know, the question itself, the answer is there. Unless that it can there be birth? I don't know. I don't know why is not because if this one is eternal, then can there be birth or death for this one?
Mentally I know that. I know the right answer. Mentally, I don't have a direct experience of it.
Yes, actually experience, but we don't have yet the confirmation that this is true because that which we are always has been. You see, that which is aware of all the states which are coming and going and itself is not coming and going, that is what we most naturally are. That which has seen even in this seeming lifetime, has seen so many bodies and so many realms and so many experiences have happened. See in this waking and so many different dream states, and this so-called waking state which is just another dream state. And also it has experienced nothingness. No phenomenal appearance has also been experienced so often. So we see that something can be born—the sense of presence, the sense of consciousness can be born and can dissolve—but that which witnesses it is not taking birth or dying.
It seems incredibly boring.
Yes, but to who? That's not sure.
What I can sort of conceptually step back and experience that eternal being, I can... I've been there. And then it's like, 'It's so boring. Why would I want to hang out here?'
Yes, so this can be said in two ways. One is a very primal way, you see, where if you are all there is, there is no birth or death for you and nothing can ever happen to you, and it is everywhere and you are not phenomenal, then what's all of this about? Yeah. That's why I say that my favorite reason—which is not true, but you have to give a reason to things just because you have to say something—yes, but so my favorite when someone asks what is the point of the creation of this universe, I say because it was too boring. I want to make this. So then I created this play, this phenomenal experiencing in which I have pretended to be this person and playing out in all of this adventure called life with all its ups and downs, with all its seeming bondage and freedom. So if you're speaking from there saying, 'But if I'm all there is and there is nothing actually moving and yet I'm here and nothing is moving, nothing is changing, maybe I need to buy a TV or something in front of me.' So this whole phenomenal experiencing is the TV of awareness. The movie screen in which all of this is playing out. Yes, because it's too boring.
But what I was saying earlier, what I wanted to point out and stress on more, because many times as you are coming to the recognition of what you are, the mind comes in with the same thing: 'But do you really want this? This is so empty and this is boring. You will just become a vegetable. You will not have any enthusiasm. You will not have any wonder left in life.' But this is not the actual experience of the sages. They actually find that every moment is full of so much wonder and joy and peace when we drop all these expectations and fears, guilt and remorse, pride, arrogance, specialness. And all of this is gone, the stories that we have about ourselves and they are gone and we don't know anything at all, then there's so much wonder in every moment. It's so much joy, you see. So that is the voice I was cautioning against which can come in here: 'But this is so boring.' But the voice and answer is the one that... our vision, this is what you go for.
But I do know I have met other sages who all are apparently blissed-out most of the time.
I actually haven't met anyone who's blissed-out all the time. No, I actually haven't met anyone. Then maybe that is great grace because here it's not this feeling of being blissed-out all the time. What's that like? A nice way, much more natural than that. Just everything is allowed. I cannot say that there is a strong experience of bliss in every instant. All states are allowed to come and go very naturally, and yet what I see myself to be in reality is untouched by any of these states. And also there is a recognition that everything phenomenal is coming and going, and anytime there is this belief or attachment in something, then it is setting up for failure because I know that this is a temporal theory. This is so, it is going. So if I have to attach something here as me or mine, then that is bound to cause suffering because it will come and go. So if I attach even to the sensation of bliss when it comes, it is seen often enough that even this is coming and going. So if I give it the idea that it should always be like...
Everything phenomenal is coming and going, and anytime there is this belief or attachment in something, then it is setting up for failure because I know that this is a temporal theory. This is so; it is going. So if I have to take something here as me or mine, then that is bound to cause suffering because it will come and go. So if I attach even to the sensation of bliss when it comes, it is seen often enough that even this is coming and going. So if I give it the idea that it should always be like this—'Oh, for me now it is always like this'—then I know when it goes, the mind itself will come and say, 'See, now you lost your freedom.' There is the bliss, and it is that's why I said it is good news that I haven't met anyone who is blissed out all the time, because the mind would say, 'See, this is the true sage; he is always in bliss.'
Now, what can be a bit confusing is that this state of simple allowing itself, non-resistance, allowing, is a very deep peace, you see. So this peace can be confused to be like a curtain on panels of something. So when the sage says, 'I am always at peace,' he is not talking about this sense of phenomenal tasting of peace—'Oh, so peaceful, so peaceful'—not like this. It is so much peace because everything is allowed; nothing is resisted. So this is the deeper peace.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Later, yes and yes. This is the constant experience even here, except for momentary buttons getting pressed and thrown away once in a while. I have to say that mostly the experience is non-resistant, not personal. Mostly the experience here is not personal and the simple allowing of everything to come and go. Wherein there is the deep sense of ease. I don't know how it is allowing all, yes. So if there's an anger that comes, there's an ease because it's coming and it goes.
Yes, I feel ease is a very good word. I'll use this word more often. There's a deep sense of ease. It is not a struggle with life. It is not a resisting with life in any way. I like ease.
So, I guess it was a thought that said, 'Okay, so where are we now?' Look, it's that I don't know the one who tracks. I guess it's the therapist in me. Oh, the tracking one is the tracker guy. Tracking is my arch-nemesis. I have a tracker woman. A tracker woman when you monitor; she monitors what's going on. 'Okay, so where are we now?' I heard you were a good boy today, a good girl today, who believed only ten times. Right? So there's a feeling that came up of, 'Well, what do I do now? What do I do?' You know, we've had this nice conversation and now what do I do with this new insight? Like I have to go study it. Like when I get off the hangout, then I'm going to listen to this again and study it.
Actually, this happens initially because the strongest leg for the ego is the leg of the doership. Without doership, without the sense that 'What do I do now?', the ego actually cannot survive. This table, the table of the ego, just falls down without the leg of doership. So it's very natural for it to try and retain itself saying, 'Okay, what is the plan now? What do I do now? This was very nice. What do I do now?'
Now, as long as there's a sense that I can do something, then we can do two things. One is we can just not believe the next thought. Or second, we can self-inquire and ask: 'Who am I? Who is the doer? Who is the I that should do something?' So as long as the sense of doership, which you say is strong, is there, then we can either not believe the next thought—which is good, but I know it seems like a doing—so we can do this, or we can do the self-inquiry, which is also actually not a doing but can seem like it. So with either of these, then you come to this place to see that there is no doer at all. So the question when it comes, 'What do I do now?', it just becomes laughable. Just like every other thought, it becomes laughable.
So until it has become laughable, we can just not believe the next thought or we can just inquire into what I truly am. And the answer is otherwise, 'I don't know.' I don't know. Is there an I that doesn't know? Because when you say 'I don't know,' what you're actually saying is, 'I know that there is an I that doesn't know.' There is an I other than that now, yes there is. Okay, so who is this I that doesn't know? It's not I, not actually like this. It is, but this is so heavy, you know? This is just frustrating because we are used to trying to figure it out with the mind. We are used to trying to figure it out with the mind, and this is unfathomable for the mind. The mind has no chance here.
The Thread Continues
These satsangs touch the same silence.

On a similar theme
The Gateway to the Heart Temple - 2nd March 2026
2 March 2026
Ananta teaches that while God cannot be found in worldly objects, the soul is designed to reveal the Divine through the...

On a similar theme
Allowing the Atma To Reveal the True Gyana (Self-Knowledge) - 20th February 2026
20 February 2026
Ananta guides seekers to move beyond the mind's 'checker guy' and conceptual labels by resting in the witnessing...

The following day
The Dropping of These Ideas is the End of the Journey - 28th April 2016
28 April 2016