Abhanga 19 · Verse 4
Nama-Sankirtan
ज्ञानदेवी यज्ञ याग क्रिया धर्म | हरीविण नेम नाहीं दुजा || ४ ||
ज्ञानदेव के लिए यज्ञ, याग, क्रिया, धर्म | हरि के बिना और कोई नियम नहीं || ४ ||
For Dnyandev - sacrifice, rituals, dharma - there is no second vow but Hari.
jnanadevi yajna yaga kriya dharma | harivina nema nahin duja || 4 ||
After the dissolution, the vow. Dnyaneshwar signs his own name to the final verse and declares: there is no second commitment apart from Hari. Not "there should not be." There is not. The negation is absolute. All the practices he listed, sacrifice, ritual, dharma, are not rejected. They are included. But if they are performed without Hari at their center, they are a distraction wearing the costume of devotion. And if they are performed with Hari at their center, they are not separate from the Haripath at all.
This verse is for the one whose life feels divided: spiritual practice over here, daily obligation over there, and never enough of either. Dnyaneshwar says the division is the illusion. There is one vow. It does not replace your other commitments. It absorbs them. Your work becomes an offering. Your relationships become the Name in action. You do not have two lives. You have one. And that one is already held in Hari's hands.
The Living Words
Nema is the word to hold. Vow. The binding commitment that structures a devotee's life. In the Warkari tradition, a nema is not casual: to recite the Haripath each morning, to observe a fast, to visit the temple at a fixed hour. A stake planted in the ground of your day. Jnanadevi yajna yaga kriya dharma. Harivina nema nahin duja. There is no second vow apart from Hari.
The list echoes the previous verse: sacrifice, ritual, observance, duty. Dnyaneshwar repeats these not from forgetfulness but to push through to a sharper conclusion. These practices may continue. The rituals may be performed. But if they are performed without Hari at their center, they are duja: a second thing, a substitute, a vow wearing the costume of devotion. And if Hari is at their center, they are not separate from the Haripath at all.
Harivina arrives, then nahin duja drops like a stone. The lips shut on the last syllable. One commitment. Everything that participates in it is included. Everything that does not is a distraction.
Scripture References
Abandoning all dharmas, take refuge in Me alone. I will free you from all sins.
सर्वधर्मान्परित्यज्य मामेकं शरणं व्रज । अहं त्वां सर्वपापेभ्यो मोक्षयिष्यामि मा शुचः ॥
sarva-dharman parityajya mam ekam sharanam vraja | aham tvam sarva-papebhyo mokshayishyami ma shuchah ||
Abandoning all dharmas, take refuge in Me alone. I will free you from all sins. Do not grieve.
No second vow. Dnyaneshwar's harivina nema nahin duja is the exact stance of the Gita's final verse: one refuge, one surrender, one promise.
One who takes Me as the supreme and abandons every other dependence: I quickly become their deliverer.
तेषामहं समुद्धर्ता मृत्युसंसारसागरात् । भवामि नचिरात्पार्थ मय्यावेशितचेतसाम् ॥
tesham aham samuddharta mrtyu-samsara-sagarat | bhavami na chirat partha mayy aveshita-chetasam ||
For those whose thoughts are absorbed in Me, I soon become their deliverer from the ocean of death.
The one vow Dnyaneshwar names produces the one deliverer Krishna promises. The pair is tight.
One path for every temperament: the chanting of Hari's name.
योगिनां नृप निर्णीतं हरेर्नामानुकीर्तनम् ।
yoginam nripa nirnitam harer namanukirtanam
For yogis of every kind, the settled conclusion is the chanting of Hari's name.
Dnyaneshwar's single-vow teaching. The Bhagavata names the same unity: one practice that fits every path.
The Heart of It
This verse completes the arc of Abhanga 19. Verse 1 declared the wealth. Verse 2 declared the simplicity. Verse 3 declared the dissolution. Verse 4 declares the exclusivity.
There is no second vow.
This is the most uncompromising statement in the abhanga. Not the gentlest. Not the most inviting. But the most clear. And clarity, at a certain point in the spiritual life, is what you need more than gentleness.
What does it mean to have no second vow? It means Hari is not one commitment among several. He is not the spiritual department of your life, the part that gets attention during evening prayers while the rest operates on a different set of principles. There is no separate compartment labeled "spiritual" and another labeled "worldly." There is one vow. And everything falls inside it or falls outside it.
This sounds absolute because it is. But it is not as harsh as it first appears. Because the one vow does not replace your other commitments. It absorbs them. Your duty to your family does not disappear. It becomes an expression of the vow. Your work in the world does not cease. It becomes an offering. Your relationships, your labor, your creativity: all of these continue. But they are no longer separate projects. They are all Hari ka kaam. God's work.
Krishna makes the same demand in the Gita, Chapter 9, Verse 27: whatever you do, whatever you eat, whatever you offer, whatever tapas you practice, do it as an offering to Me. The instruction is not to stop doing things. It is to stop doing them for a second reason. There is only one reason: Hari. Everything else is included in that reason.
Dnyaneshwar signs this verse with his own name because the claim requires personal authority. He, Jnanadeva, who wrote the Jnaneshwari at fifteen, who mastered philosophy, who knew every text and every tradition from the inside: he declares that there is no second vow. This is not the declaration of a man who has never encountered the alternatives. It is the declaration of a man who has encountered everything and arrived at one.
The verse also carries an implicit promise. If there is no second vow, then there is no divided life. The anxiety of trying to balance spiritual practice with worldly obligation dissolves here. You do not have two lives. You have one life, and it is offered to Hari. The external details remain. You still wake up, go to work, pay your bills, love your family. But the internal division, the feeling of being pulled in two directions, of never doing enough in either direction: that division ends.
And this is where the verse becomes tender rather than stern. Think about what the one vow actually feels like from the inside. It is not the grim determination of a soldier following orders. It is closer to what happens when you fall in love. You do not make a solemn resolution to think about the beloved. You cannot stop thinking about the beloved. The beloved is present in every errand, every meal, every conversation. Not because you forced it. Because love reorganized everything around itself. That is what the one vow is. Not discipline. Recognition. You are not forcing Hari into the center of your life. You are discovering that Hari was already there, and everything else was arranged around that center all along.
The Bhagavata Purana describes the gopis of Vrindavan in exactly this way. They did not renounce their households. They churned butter, they tended children, they quarreled with their mothers-in-law. But Krishna was in every act. The churning was Krishna. The tending was Krishna. Even the quarreling, somehow, was Krishna. There was no second because love had made the second impossible.
This is freedom. Not the freedom of having no responsibilities. The freedom of having only one. And that one is love.
There is no second vow. There is only this one. And this one does not require your perfection.
The Saints Who Walked This Road
The Warkari tradition has a phrase for this: Hari he chi daivatya. Hari alone is the deity. Not Hari plus the family deity. Not Hari plus the clan protector. Not Hari and also, on the side, a little attention to the local goddess. Hari alone.
This single-pointed devotion is not narrowness. It is depth. The Warkari does not deny other forms of the divine. The Warkari says: I have made my commitment. And in that commitment, all other forms are included, because Hari is not one deity among many but the Name for the divine reality that every deity reflects.
Tukaram embodied this exclusivity with a ferocity that still burns in his abhangas. When the Brahmin establishment challenged his right to compose devotional poetry, when they threw his manuscripts into the Indrayani, when they tried to silence him through social pressure and religious authority, Tukaram did not waver. He had one vow. Vitthal. Everything else was negotiable. His social standing was negotiable. His reputation was negotiable. His safety was negotiable. His vow was not.
Tradition records that the manuscripts floated back undamaged after thirteen days. But the point of the story is not the miracle. The point is that Tukaram kept his vow even when it seemed to have cost him everything. There was no second option. There was no fallback position. There was Vitthal, and there was nothing else.
Namev's exclusivity took a different form. For Namdev, the commitment to Vitthal was so total that he saw Vitthal everywhere. In every person, in every creature, in every object. The vow was not a boundary that excluded the world. It was a lens through which the entire world became Vitthal. There was no second because there was nothing that was not the first.
Muktabai, Dnyaneshwar's younger sister, sang the same truth from the perspective of one who had seen through everything. She composed in a voice that was direct, stripped of ornament, unwilling to entertain half-measures. Her call, "Tati ughada Dnyaneshwara," "Open the door, Dnyaneshwar," is itself an abhanga of single-pointed demand. She does not say: consider opening the door when convenient. She says: open it. Now. There is nothing else to do.
Four saints. One vow. The fierce poet, the gentle tailor, the philosopher's sister. None of them arrived at exclusivity through narrowness. They arrived at it through depth. They went so far into the Name that there was simply nothing left outside it.
The Refrain
हरि मुखें म्हणा हरि मुखें म्हणा | पुण्याची गणना कोण करी
Say Hari with your mouth, say Hari with your mouth; who can count the merit of this?