Your Inner Attitude Should Be Positionless - 27th June 2018

So once you pick up the idea that 'I am not all there is, there is something besides me,' then innately you will not like this idea. You try to complete yourself and make yourself whole. So like they say, that one lie, then you have to follow a hundred lies. So the first lie, if you can deconstruct them and find your fullness... this thing of wholeness is true, it must be here now. Your holiness does not come and go, because then it would not be whole. So what convinces you now that you are limited? Before the thought comes, what convinces you? Before you make a conclusion, what convinces you that you are separate?

The body makes you feel yourself later.

So you're sitting here right now. There are some sensations which we call the body. Are those sensations creating separateness? Or how will they be in the sensation as separateness? The ways to get this, because if you see through this, is the appearance of some sensation, appearance of some perceptions, in itself automatically creating separateness? Or actually, these sensations are just appearing in the wholeness which is you? But when the label comes 'me,' or the identification comes 'I am my body,' only then does living separation occur. So what is the condition as it is? Are the sensations enough to cause separation? No. Okay, look for yourself. I want to do too many determining tips for circumference. What is on the side of the separation, and that sideways affect you? The sensation is coming, losing that is separator. Can you tell me what is on either side of the separation?

To put simply, if you say that that is a fence, can you tell me what is on this side of the fence and that side of the fence looking? And if you want to go really slowly, then they could say, 'Okay, what do you mean? What do we mean by body?' Is there experience of the body besides sensations? Like you don't know you have an ear right now, then somebody comes and pulls it, then you have sensation here, really. So that we create pollen in the body these days. These are sensations in our experience, isn't it so? Or if ancillary perception you want to count, then you say surpass sensory perception and sensation. So let's use a bigger sensation which includes all of this. So these sensations are there. What are these sensations separating? If you did not know the word 'separating,' would there be a separation? This is nothing. It is not really a real separation; it is a make-believe one.

Make-believe how? If we label something as 'me' and 'other,' it puzzles to believe that there is a 'me' and there is 'another.' This is where the entire dynamic on which the mind works. The whole premise is that there is a 'me' and there is 'other.' Now, in fact, only that on this side is consciousness, on that side is consciousness, and these sensations are also between consciousness. Or let's say the sensations are also conscious. What is your take? Take your time over them. Not so that you can believe it, but so that you can see. Once you see it, actually... I know it's popularism, 'I have to see it to believe it.' You don't need to believe it. It's like saying that right now we believe that the Earth is a sphere, but if you were to fly on a spaceship and you will see it, then you don't need to believe it; you've seen it.

So see what is on both sides of the so-called separation. And what is that separation itself? Is there such a thing? And one more tip is that you start with the presumption there is balance, and then tell me if something really comes and secretes. No. If on that side of the picket fence you were not there, then how would you know then there you look that side of the picket fence? Are you getting the best? If something separates and I am on this side, then how do I know what is here? Are you there on both sides? On both? Exploring, it's worth exploring because we get stuck at this idea that the body separates us and therefore we like to continue to experience the sensations of the body. 'I'll feel separate. I must constantly have my attention only in this unadulterated awareness and then I will call myself free.' But that is not true.

Because if that was true, then once the sage found the truth about themselves, they would go into this deep real sleep state, one of these states, and they would never experience the waking state again. Because you cannot experience the waking state unless there is attention on phenomena. So it is not true that freedom means that my attention must only be in this country, no more phenomenal awareness. In fact, there is no such thing as attention on phenomenal awareness. It is just that the spring, the spring is retrieved but completely where you cannot even tell that there is a spring. So if there is clean, like attention which is getting content from everywhere, so it receives back to your own sense of unchanging form and there is no concept even of attention. In sleep state, you cannot say, 'My attention was on this order.'

So we've tried to demolish a few concepts. What is that? Body sensations called separation, which is an eighty percent. The second means that freedom means that only my attention must only, only be on this particular thing. And then aptly this, it sounds free to you. The potential is always whatever. That's a very tree tree. Must be anything can come and go, but algae we can say it can come. See, it's safe to come to the state. It can come, everything can come in the waking state. This thing can go in the waking state. There is no freedom for you without having freedom for the world. When I became free, the whole world became free. What is it actually? Not like everybody became a silly thing like that, then what will we be doing here? So I realize that I am free and this world, which is just an appearance for me, is opposite see free and was being given the sweet freedom which is the opposite of desire and aversion.

What is desire? I don't accept which appearance is going to come next. I want to have an idea of what should come. I want only pink flowers to come, but like five hundred. So why everything? But when we say 'only,' we should be total desire. When we say the opposite, 'Oh, this should not come. Pain should not come. This should not come.' So we're trying to take away freedom from life and say, 'This is how life should be.' So not only to be first created my phone with you about a cell of this limited 'me' individuality, and then this geometric wants to control everything that is appearing in disappear. I mean, I am entitled to this one, but life owes me that. Life doesn't owe us anything because you don't even exist. The one that seems so entitled doesn't exist.

So are desires and aversions automatic rush? Why not? Because, oh, it's a bad thing to have desire, you should not have like that. But the fundamental basis that you are a separating, separate, separately existing entity, that itself is for. Directly use the for this believe. But there are 'me' and 'other' believes wrong. The doership and design and naturally none of this is present. And I'm glad you said openly that it's the body which makes me good, but it is worth exploring if this is true. And if this was true—and I want to say to you because you'll understand what I'm saying because you contemplate it easy—then Karma Yoga would not work. If you do no physical process, then just to shine your light on it would not work. Then there not physical or a manifest deconstruction would have to happen. Then better to do nothing about the body actually.

Physical practices can unlock this not if there is really enough, then you would need a physical I don't know so. So if you tighten on, you know it is a big rule and the knot was actually tied, then no matter how much light you shine, you're not going to make the knot right. The knot will not go, isn't it so? Karma Yoga is one where shining a light on our existence, we are looking at what is true. The light of knowledge through the Guru is supposed to be the bringer of the light, you see. But light would not be enough then if there was actual physical now. The gurus better bigger tweak it. I know it can seem a bit strange what I'm saying, but actually is raised until I'm saying that if it can be resolved just have the light of knowledge, then it must only mean that this knot was never there and I truly was misperceiving it, you see. I'm misunderstanding what I'm perceiving. The grants eyes vanish shown my to light on it, I see that it is completely are not it already. That is really w.w.

But light would not be enough then, if there was actual physical... now the Guru's better, bigger tweak it. I know it can seem a bit strange what I'm saying, but actually it is as I'm saying: that if it can be resolved just by the light of knowledge, then it must only mean that this knot was never there and I truly was misperceiving it. You see? I'm misunderstanding what I'm perceiving. The granthi vanishes when I shine my light on it. I see that it is completely un-knotted already. That is really the way in which the world works. Someone said the truth does not need to be helped. The truth does not need to be helped; it is only the false that needs to be taken away. So Shankara said that we have misperceived the rope to be a snake. Then, found the light of Gyan, in the light of knowledge, through knowledge you see that there is no snake. There is just the rope. So it is not that some actual separation is there which then has to be fixed, but it just has to be seen that that which we are calling separation is never actually separated. Anything I see is just a correction of belief. It is not that it is a physically manifest change of anything. It can come with its own energy changes, but those are byproducts. That is not the knot. Do you get a little bit of time to see? The point is, it's not like a physical decoupling and then you would have to physically move back together. Then the seeing or the inquiry would not work. You just have to see for yourself what the truth is, and you will see that the decoupling never happened. There is nothing that can be decoupled.

So this idea that the body creates separation is false, because this body you just experience, as I said—I'll share from my experience and then you can validate it if it is true for you—as a set of sensations. But all these sensations are contained within me. I am on all sides of it. I am on all sides of these sensations. So where is it separating? So if you can see for yourself that this is true, then you will see that no actual separation is there. These sensations are experienced in the same space of my being where these words are experienced. I am speaking these words. You will say, 'Okay, there's another one besides me who is speaking these words.' But where are these words being known? In the same space where those sensations are felt. No? So that space is there. Is there something that you can say from experience? There is something, but it is not in this space and you are not really peaceful. So I am asking whether you can say from experience that there is something, but it is not contained in this space of my existence. You cannot say. Therefore, all perceptions, all experiences happen in this one space of my being. So my existence and just the appearance of some sensation like the body or some energy contraction that we call the mind is leading to no real separation.

So we've taken up the space which is actually unlimited and without any real separation, and it's like we've taken a piece of paper and we've drawn a map on it: India, Pakistan. So now if the people start saying, 'But I'm just Indian,' the people start saying, 'I'm Indian,' because these boundaries, they separate. What would you tell that people? Look beyond those boundaries and see whether where the rest of it is contained also on you. So every perception is experienced only in my existence. But we've learned how to separate this map and say that this is what contains me. This is actually... reality is more ludicrous than the paper because I'm not even the paper. The paper is also just my existence, manifest existence. And so if the people came to you with this problem, you see, that 'I am in India and America is doing this to me. We are India, this is America, and he's bothering me.' What advice would you give to these people? So you've only got the example. He's a vehicle in which the maps are also live. India, with all of this, all the people itself came to you complaining, 'Father, I am India, but America is bothering me.' You tell the people, 'Oh, I created you. But look at what you are. You disappear. Where is America? Is it not even you?'

It's like that example in the Ashtavakra Gita of the thousand-handed monster. This hand is bothering this hand. It's bothering the thousand-handed monster. Each hand has a weapon, so it's hitting itself and then complaining to the sage saying that 'This hand is bothering this one, this one is bothering me.' These are all our mental emotions, and each emotion promotes some condition, some separation. Right? So just like this, we come believing that I am a limited thing. No, you are the whole universe and beyond that. And I'm not speaking in metaphorical terms at all. I'm speaking completely literally. Okay? Sometimes when I'm saying this, you are hearing it as if it's a beautiful poem. But you are literally that, here and right now. See? I'm not painting a beautiful picture for you. I'm talking about your reality. But problems are based on some mental idea that I am only this. If the wall came complaining to you that 'I am a spot on the wall,' you would say, 'Even look at what you are. The tiny spots do nothing to you.' But that's what will be shining in your life. We are onto a screen. So as you start inquiring like this, that notion of duality or something is gone, and then you will find that there is nothing truly outside of you. You contain all, and yet you are even beyond this all. There is that which is the one phenomenal witness even within that appearance manifest. And as you inquire, as you see in satsang, this will become clear. You could see.

So then what happens very often is that you see this, but our habit of that separation, the habit of belief in individuality is so strong, it quickly goes to: 'Very good, very done. So now what does this mean for me? Do I have a good life yet? Do I want to start sharing such things? Is it lawful?' So this is where the example of the ocean and the coconut came in. You probably haven't heard it. So what you're discovering is that you are the boundless ocean, timeless, ever-present. You are the boundless ocean in which the arcs of the universe, they come and go. You are this big, small, boundless ocean where the arcs of the universe, they come and go. And this is actually your discovery now. But then what will happen is the mind will come and say, 'So then what happens to me? Then what happens to Ananta?' So you are discovering that you are the ocean, but the concern is still about the coconut which is floating on the surface. Maybe the insight that you are having does not mean anything for this coconut that you consider yourself to be. In the past, it's like saying, 'I was pretending that I am Sri Lanka. I was pretending that I'm Sri Lanka, but now it is found that I am the whole paper.' But now, what does that mean for Sri Lanka? But what is that to you? So this is the language that often gets us in satsang. 'I discovered that Sri Lanka was paper, but what about Sri Lanka?' Like me, like this is not it.

I say sometimes the thing, I ask her a question. It's a movie. I had a beautiful Sapna of archiving, being together, but this body-mind, it no benefits from that. All benefit goes to this one, not even trends. So you said more easily, 'Okay, it goes to him. I'm okay with that.' All the halo, all the words, all the, you know, followers, everything came to this side. Okay. But we still want something about the coconut. It's not that the other one will take over your himself. I'm only saying the perks. So this mind, the halo, everything, nothing—you have no benefit from this. You see what you are? You see that you are the boundless ocean. All these universes that come in, I mean millions of times, you see all the cycles of times and space and all of this will happen. And yet we are so deeply connected because of our conditioning, you see? Because of our habit to this one grain of sand. We discovered that the whole desert is nothing but an appearance within me. Soon we say, 'What does it mean then for that grain of sand?' This is where limitedness, individuality, selfishness comes back even in inspiration. 'I had the insight, how come he gets the perks?' Is it so? Once you find that you're the ocean, then you don't have to come back into the coconut ball.

So this is what the mind will do, especially after a very strong experience when this body—some people call it body consciousness, but this sense of body consciousness doesn't seem so central to you, which is also another way of saying like me dissolved, something like that. Then he quickly tries to bring back limitation to the mind by saying this now. So what is going to happen? We have a beautiful example. One he was in satsang, English education literature, so huge, and he felt like he was really... it was clear who you say that. So then he's not feeling... so what are people going to be able to recognize? Are they going to come to me or satsang? So such a model, he's tree-dwelling, move these thoughts. What happened? It was so clear to me. I wonder if it is... if there is radiance, something. So he went out of the satsang premises, and those who visit them know that after the satsang, a lot of people collect. So he went out, stepped out. First thing that happened is this lady, this foreign lady, she came to... she's commenting on the great, you know, peace. 'I really wanted to...' So he's thinking, 'Can she see it? Is she going to ask me, you know, are you awake? Yes.' Like that. So she comes to... because we can have this thing in crazy. These are specimens' words with spiritual experience. 'Now that I'm saying that there is no me, what does it mean for me? Now that I found the light of my being, what's gonna happen to me?' That's all this the mind will try and play. We might even buy it. It's okay. None of this is meant to bother you. I'm just trying to point out some things here so that you can look at them. And if you're falling for these tricks, you're falling for these tricks of the mind, then you can just look at it and say, 'Another one bites the dust. Another trick.' So that is the purpose of pointing these things out, because many times these things happen. You don't really... habits are still there.

So it's too jacked, Father. At this moment, I am having lunch. Do I have no mouth, no food requirement? Separation of the fact body. Why are you having lunch? Oh, the lunch is having you. There is no mouth, no food to classes.

You can't say, 'I do it,' and still believe in that separation that 'I am this body and I'm having... I'm partying, sitting over there,' whatever it might be. What is it? What are you? Have you this being sandwich? This all exists. Are you the space in which the space exists? Are you something which is contained in the body? If you have no mouth, you cannot be having lunch. Both sides of the sentence don't correspond to each other. And this is a kind of a greater confusion. This is the ocean and coconut. If you are the ocean, then you are the space in which this space is arising and the body is one another appearance. How do you say you are having lunch? And you've all had this belief that countries have to be untied, as they say in a yogi part. It was just a belief that I'm glad we got rid of it. Although it seems easier to recognize the one space in which all sensations arise, when the body's eyes are closed, there seems to be a stronger belief in separation with the eyes open.

Yes, this is because there is more visual stimulus and it can seem like, 'Yes, this is a clearly perceivable boundary.' The other thing that happens is when the eyes are open, it gives us a visual perspective which seems to be centered like this. Like, this head is the center of all my visual perception, so I must be something that came with this head. The same thing happens in a dream also. In fact, the same thing can happen in a daydream. So once you start imagining... see, I used to do it a lot. I mean, it didn't apply to the kid, never seen Advaita and Milan, but I used to have these daydreams of playing them. I do because it's a dream. Then what happened? We did like you're like a little boy. Let me do... you have the centrality of perspective looking at each other. So all the experiences we've had through various... like many actually near this, out-of-body experiences. In fact, all of us have had at some level.

The same thing can happen in a daydream. So once you start imagining—see, I used to do it a lot. I mean, it didn't apply to the kid, never seen a by-two in Milan, but I used to have these daydreams of playing them. I do because it's a dream. Then what happened? We did like you're like a little boy. Let me do you have the centrality of perspective looking at each other. So all the experiences we've had through various was like many actually near at this out-of-body experiences. In fact, all of us have had at some level or the other, but maybe better that we don't. So, but we have these out-of-body experiences where in G like, 'Whoa, I saw I could see with body also.' What is the body then? How do I out-of-body? So we cannot trust this so-called visual perspective. You can't rely on that because you are the entire dream. In fact, the tree reproduction within you, and yet within the dream there is a fun dream character which seemed like, 'Oh, that is the one that is looking.' And they said at the center of colleges.

So it is true that when the eyes are closed, then stimulus that seems to be processed is less. It's clearer to see that these sensations, but vibrations on my own being, in my own is so much more. The mind is quick to label everything. Seems completely fine to rise many times. Most of satsang I'd notice also when I look at some of the recording also satsang here, it shared will that excluded completely fine. Nothing. Of course, I know that some language you were taking people around showing them, so I know that it might be a strange thing to do in your job walking around on the place. This is the tower, yes. But let me give you the opportunity to fire to the centrality of thought. Feel like it is in the head or is it not? Now it can also feel like I am something, some somebody sitting behind my eyes, like there's a person sitting behind my iris. But no surgeon has ever found this on this person behind anybody's eye.

It can also feel like suppose you have some problem in relationship, anything like, 'Oh, hottie, all of this is just green chemical.' You see, the experience can feel like it is in the heart. Then if you're having some gratitude, you can feel like the throat. It's too tough seeing some exactitude of grief, and that's what great football. But if anybody found in increase particles or attitude particles in the throat ever? Never. So there are various layers of our existence. Some call it the sheets, and these are sensational quality. They're experienced another layer of our existence. But since we believe that we are this, everything is contained within this body. You think you like, 'Oh, this is where it is happening.' There is never any actual grief in the throat, but if you let my throat is clogged up because of you. So the thought can seem like it is perceived here or some screen is here. So you can seem like the entire universe, which I call the dream, appear within my head. Put the universe which I call a dream scheme—and you believe it will appear if you feel like I was running around there isn't scales of my head follow. So do not in the physical head.

But this question now often shall be asking the truth that we thank using a closed mind. So when you close your eyes, very good, I say go within. Where are we actually going? Zero inside our head. But inside our physical head, the great open space which in imagination can be projected. I mean, every can come and project itself. In fact, these things can come so strongly that it might feel like that is more real and this something to fail to the background. What is wrong in being a coconut convolution anyway? The whole world of coconuts seem to be walking around. Am I going to learn one thing? Come, come, come, I will show you like you're the ocean. No, it is because you ask and say, 'Show me what I really am. I'm suffering too much as a limited coconut water.' Is all those who asked, I say, 'But you read yeah.' There's nothing inherently right or wrong anything in this world. But if you want to see the truth, but you continue to the utilize, then that is a journey. What is the journey? You've been pointed to the truth but continue, continue to believe bags.

So for the conversation goes on. What did the woman say to the man in blue she cage? I couldn't hear except—so this man, he was feeling like he's enlightened. You wondering whether people will start to recognize it now. So he was carrying me thoughts of wonder what's going to happen after he was so clear. So the woman walks up to him and he started killing, 'Is she going to ask me and satsang question or is she going to say I see something when I see you?' You see, will you tell me something like that? So but instead she came to him very authoritatively and say, 'Are you the autorickshaw?' You know, India we have this tuk-tuk, you know, tuk-tuk, the three meetings tuk-tuk. So she came up that I took driver which she wanted to get a higher tuk-tuk. So she came and asked him, 'Either tuk-tuk drivers?' And I'm saying that is good in a way because I will get worse that this means something special for me. This awakening experience can have something, some sort of benefit for me.

Other the reason is there no relation between thoughts and actions as tall as a decision not lead to action and the body act if you stop you leave?

In fact, this is very good contemplate now. Very happy to receive a question like this. Many, many, many, in fact I will say that most times the body is acting without believing thoughts. Wisely, I have to speak about this body. This body is speaking all these words now, it's acting them. What is that? I don't see that that process is happening that, 'Okay, this is what I've already seen banks.' But you see this, don't say that it is just flowing spontaneously. This is the same way that everything is being heard over there; seemingly it is also being heard here. So nobody and your words are like that. I'm not saying something special is happening here, just that we see it differently.

Then you get into a position somehow you might even decide, 'Okay, I better tell them this.' But many times we find that words are something else. I gave this example of going to work because probably it happened tomorrow. I'm just going to tell my boss, you know, to get lost today, and the mouth opens. So what work is needed to be done to be? So many times with happened like this. So all three combinations are possible for Kingdom. No, it might happen what can come that action might happen. Those time will lead us to this cause and effect causality sort of relationship. No thought might come and yet one action might happen. So in our life you see that all three things happen. But the mind latches onto this because without the story there's nothing to hang on to. Everybody would say it was said the bird flies, lands on the branch of the coconut cream, coconut falls. There is nothing to it. The mind will say, 'What? Because the world we were landed on the ground they know the coconut must have fallen.' But is anybody getting all that we cannot see?

So in the same way, okay, let's also presume that the first one is true, that there is a relation between thoughts and action. So what is that relation? Who is the cognizer of thoughts and therefore the design decided of action? The best, at best, if you come up with an answer to this, you will say consciousness. Then consciousness itself paid to the thought, consciousness itself created action. We take it on to somebody individual. Why I say the answer to all why this consciousness? It seemed like a strain on say initially like, 'How can why be consciousness?' Why does this happen to you? Total counts for that amount. Why does gravity? Why is my girlfriend upset with consciousness? Why can I never do anything I decided to do? Consciousness. Why is my life? Why is my life so good? Why can I never go if you go so strongly related? Let's look at this right. If there was a strong relation to billion thought in action, everybody had a different plan for their life. Was this in your clan 10 years ago, coming to strains at some?

Why did the in the Bible like an O with a Jewish Jesus? Why is it said in the Bible the road to hell is paved with good intentions? Yeah, because they said of course they're talking about a completely different thing. But even saying that this thought what part and intending to follow up on the thought is not enough. That means it cannot be directly correlated. So Guruji says you are not the thinker of your heart and you want to do error correction water just appearances and consciousness. What is the difference between a thought and action? Both I guess perception, sensation. Where are they coming from? May ask you something else: Do you know how to move a finger? Why say yes, I'll do here he goes. But no, how do you do it? Are you firing me wrong? So do you know how action happens?

Now is the saying the other day also to please the B is he metal and here is a good they've done study where they said six seconds before even the action starts to happen, independent of whether the thought has come or not, already the nervous system is prepared to move the hand. It's not waking Nevada study. So the deeper intelligence which is politics—that's why these examples are very good. The three not thinking of going is next large. If you look at the intelligence of this world, you will see some beautiful things. How we even knew what birds know where to fly in my vision secret season are the deciding, 'Let me go west because everyone.' Everything in nature is telling us that everything is moving in the screen.

Hey beloved Father, in Brahma Kumaris they say I am Atma working through this body. So is it the mind is this way? Okay, let me not because you make these presses and then if I say something it will sound like I'm contradicting somebody else. So let's do you might in read read where they say what they say: I am Atma working through this body. So is it the money? I spend some time with them. Is mind not top of two different places? So we're working through this body which one? If I say that the universe is your body, you go to Atma and the universe is the second question is mine Matar everything is everything is when consciousness all's in the fear there is a little appeal there we are believing which will appear on all things appear. Let's say sometimes here is no future there when no thing and if s is something in a way it has to manifest with everything we in a worldly way I can see them when why it is separated into its constituents you will see that all the colors are there why does not say no this is not these references remarkable.

So everything is consciousness. I used to get this complaint at the beginning of satsang but while you always beating up on the mind it's also God then I used to say because immature me you see but also consciousness so if you know what to avoid because that is doubly then although everything is made of the God limiting its influence if you have a child who's trying to convince you that you are spider-man you say who the child will go to God so why must we have to be spider the child have a fantasy or designed in that particular way the mind is designed to no particular way to convince you absorb something that you are not will you give up your own inside for this word somebody else's so yes the mind is also consciousness but it is that aspect of consciousness which in the design is meant to convince consciousness itself.

Then in response to the previous question both the finger moves I recall being dot the brain instructs the body waste and nobody has given us no they don't have an idea of how the game works any theories come in their time and be good this is the thing with recent on it ok I say often not so much in the work but I say often that we can trust more that knowledge which has been around for 3,000 years there is some little this is the knowledge which are they required in every 10 years what they same changes you can look at this medicine till 5 years a look at cholesterol is the biggest enemy why we rethink all the cholesterol is good oh it's understood so these are new Sciences especially when it comes to the brain Queen and what

This is the thing with research on it, okay? I say often, not so much in the work, but I say often that we can trust more that knowledge which has been around for 3,000 years. There is some little... this is the knowledge which is required. Every 10 years, what they say changes. You can look at this medicine. Till five years ago, look at cholesterol; it was the biggest enemy. Why? We rethink, and now cholesterol is good. Oh, it's understood. So these are new sciences, especially when it comes to the brain and what the scientists call consciousness. Oh yes, it's very, very good.

Any conclusions being part of the basis of if they can handle only God? Either he'll be able to just leave it. Father, what is the advice you would give for the best way to remain positionless? What advice would you give for the best way to remain? This appearance is there, and we discard also an offer to remain. Piece of advice?

And the past non-conformist comes, and depending on your temperament, you can choose to either surrender every notion or you can inquire into them. Given the nature of business which you seem to be politically, by knowing that they cause you suffering. So suppose the notion is that 'I am not free.' 'I am not really giving this very popular notion.' Then you can inquire into the nature of it. Tremendous, like that. To inquire to the purity, improvement as out, even as a music reflects extra power.

The best is actually the term positionlessness itself. Great advice, positionlessness. Except if that itself becomes like a solid notion. 'Position is to be so many.' Then that is not positionless. We are too many notions without positionlessness itself. Though that positionlessness is not talking about any postpartum or any guilt, anything to do with the power. Positionless means it's a direct reminder to you. I don't want to use the term 'drop it' because then 'drop it' becomes that version of nationalism. 'Drop it' becomes a reminder to when the world is seen, the Self is not seen. There's this quote from Adi Shankara, and only the calculation from Sanskrit to English, something lost and found this. So we have seen now, are you seeing the world or is the world to be able to see?

And there's a beautiful exercise in Advaita where it is: I can see so much self-consciousness comes less. Look around the room and without labels, is there something crying out to you and saying 'I am the world'? So 'the world' is a label that we put on the Self, this manifest aspect to discern. She's not in this world. Now that is saying 'I am a world, I'm separate from the Self.' Being sold by the objects in itself, and the separation is not being sold by the objects in themselves. It is when we label that 'this is world' that is then that's in separation. So the ticket, that statement is when we are interpreting something as if it is a lower, then it can seem like this Self becomes our square. And you don't make that distinction. If you make no distinction—awareness, consciousness, body, mind, world, me, other—even these terms, Advaita, hearings, at some ultimately have to be thrown away. There's no need for any distinction at all in reality.

So these terms are used so that we can come to a space of neutrality by canceling out for the existing conditions are how we looked around and asked. And then a little question about what the actions could still happen below. Like I keep saying these days, I don't need to label 'glass' to drink from this thing. All the things. If your child does not need to have a notion of anything, does not need to have a notion of breast or milk to drink me, which I name is pre-language and all that. This basically means these hands, we lose a childlike innocence. The child is crying bigger than in film and nonfiction, leaving the child. But when we become older, how do we tell you? Especially the voyage that we are talking about, like a girl, this kind of identity that because idea of control talking action.

If you stop even labeling to the sensation, don't call anything part and anything else, actually all of these perceptions and even in the liberal perception, that is when your heart houses goddess means a dog with me, either belonging to same nor samsara. The week of return electronica. I feel self-condemned for it. This is me, but it's honest occasionally. Barbegal tunic and nothing out that this mean. What is the one I expect? Shouldn't you guys are good? The thing is that the meaning of will get centrality in a good report, in great proclamation mean now. Humility means there is no such thing and you know, like you see, it is it yet. I've never asked me want to be this way or accurate good or bad. Always only encourage all of you to speak from your true insight about yourself inside.

Some of you like little children try to pause the videos over there. I believe what happened is that all these tricks we try to use to co-opt actually the Guru mistake. It's not fair to me. It also means among the other game that if the one voice which is still moving to... just imagine if the wastage is telling you that you are beyond this, if you are not this move also starts to buy your stories of me. Whenever you turn, most of us have the voices which are telling you that you are me. There is one voice that you come across which is telling you that you have marked this loop, you not the cannot look at the federation. If that one also starts really, you know, the community tourism today, they're very well that you... it's important one touch because I often get this company that 'Bikini don't accept me as I always.' This is just this kind of because I get 'Why don't you love me like I want to be loved by you?'

But if I fall into all of these motions, if I get co-opted as I usually do, this mean psychology and then I'm saying me, I'm not speaking about Ananta, speaking order into cave voice did you believe this? If that also could come to waters of the mind and says we need to be this. So I'm not giving you a position in terms of activity or how you should be your house after you that your interacting should be position-wise. In an activity planner stance should be open like space. Even sometime your friend's body is what activity, no activity going on, but you know if you are open, spacious. So non-doership does not mean this way or that way in terms of activity now too. So not only money is also do is you take the position that 'I am spiritually I want our money.' It's also doing now. You are doing the not earning money the same way as we're doing going to work in minimum.

So the idea is not about the activity to see that you are not the doer or not doer. Both of those terms would apply to someone who does not exist. To see that I am much beyond just activities of this one body or the inactivity of conference you are. I know that you are not that on do you have nothing to do with what the body is going to do, you know microwave. That's why we were talking about decision making the worship earlier. So suppose you decided to make a lot of money today and tomorrow there were no life energy, the body is a what? What uses that decision? And suppose today you decided that 'I'm going to be a sake everything,' like energies plane to you know, creating Google Ads and you're starting of business, you're doing all of this stuff. This is how light force claim.

But we when we presume some sort of individualistic control this way or that way, when we get into this is a struggle that many of us when we will come to a video soon. If you lie to the master saying 'on to uShip,' so then I must do they're not doing. Someone sit on my bed and meditate or something. That's also in this realm is the realm of activity. Activity will happen either sitting down with an activity. I will do it sitting down. This idea that there is of to be here individually doing or not, that is what I am asking. Asking five well, either the do or not yo you are ended by saying 'are we to do nothing?'

Nobody you can ever show me this do nothing. Do nothing and you do nothing. You're looking do nothing, breathing you nothing you can do. Do nothing then you do the do nothing. Nobody can do it. There is no such thing 'I do nothing' because this waking state is the state of activity. This is always doing happening in this state, you see? But you are not doing it all. It is that which you consider yourself to be. So even if I give you an answer in the affirmative, 'Yes, you are to do nothing,' who can succeed in this instruction without? Do nothing means see that you are not that, you see? See that you are not the not-doer because you can do the non-doing if you can take a position that 'I am not to do.' I'm sorry, wah wah is a second, okay? But you are doing the sitting of the cave. Forget about it. Thank you brother for unlimited travel to the one true voice in the real storm of green points. You all so much for being it's a tentative. Satguru Mooji Baba Ki Jai.