There Is Just This Immortal Self - 14th March 2018
Saar (Essence)
Ananta guides seekers to recognize that all distinctions and limitations are mere conceptual dust within the one Self. He emphasizes that individual doership is a fallacy, as every movement is the effortless dance of one consciousness.
The notion of strong can apply only to your limitation; how can anything be too strong for the universe?
The jumping over the moon to the truth is completely effortless; it is your original state.
The mind has only one trick: to convince you that the Being you are is a limited entity.
intimate
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
So, the Self is really not making a distinction, and yet in the play of this individualization, it seems to use this pretend, make-believe distinction. And you are discovering that you are this one Self and all these differences are just ideas, just notions with no reality about them. I think in force, consciousness to be deluded... I was saying the other day that if you want to say something is wrong because that also becomes a habit—that the mind is too strong, the emotion is too strong—no motion, no matter how strong it might have seemed, can survive this one. All the conceptual dust is already off you automatically now. So, the notion of 'strong' can apply only to that idea of our limitation. How can something be strong for that which is the entire universe, which is the light of this whole universe? Can something be too strong for that? Huh? Something being too strong for your Being would imply that your Being is a limited entity, you see.
So, something is only too strong for any idea you have about yourself. If you have an idea that 'I am this way,' then life will come and show you that you are also that way. If you have an idea that life should only be this way, then life will also come and show you that life has no limitation; it can also give you the other way. So, all oppositions are fundamentally just nonsense. How can that which is everything, which includes both the opposites of everything, have a position which is something? So, don't try to apply this to yourself in the sense of... don't try to apply this to the notion that you have about yourself, because then you start trying to behave as if this body is the Self and this body should always be, you know... since then we don't have to do what I mean is... I mean, sometimes the struggle becomes to try and leave it. The presentation of this body, in the appearance of this body, it must be apparent that this one is free or something like that. We don't need that. The body is just one aspect of your appearance, just the same as any other body.
So, this sense of individual control over this body is a complete fallacy. Its action, their movements, are as much part of the movement of the apparent movement of the one consciousness as any other. Why do we let go of this entire sense of individual doership or take on the entire? And everybody doing everything is your own, you see. But don't draw these emotional lines in the one appearance. This entire appearance is in the light of the one Being, which is your Being. Great. I've been using this example: look at one sheet of paper which you divided in this world as a map with so many different notions, you see. The notion of separation of countries—it is not, let me say, no. So, if I draw out all these countries on this map, nothing happened really to the sheet of paper. It is still one sheet of paper. And then we say, 'I am from there' or 'from this one and this one,' but it's not true. It is just a map. You are there in that map, and the light in which this map is perceived, the perceiving is you. That our awareness of this perceiving is also you. The map is you, the perceiver is you, that which is aware of perception is you. This world is you. The space in which the space of this world is there is you. So, the Being, the light of which this world seems to appear, is you. That which is aware even of your Being is you. And at that point, it becomes irrelevant to say 'you' or 'me' or 'I' because there is only one. Our descriptions fade.
You are seeing this, you are aware of this, only this you are. But you have in your employment also one labeler. The labeler comes and says, 'This is good, this is bad, this I want, this I don't want,' you see. 'This is me, this is other.' This is the labeler of distinctions. And actually, there are none. The appearance of distinct qualities does not prove... the appearance proves that there are different beings? No. The appearance of distinct qualities does not prove there are two beings or there are two Selves. It is as absurd as saying that because there's an appearance of five fingers, there must be five of me because they appear differently. Why you don't say that? They are five of me because five fingers are there? In the same way, because all of these qualities appearing in your own space of Being doesn't lead to any actual separation. It is just the cumulative appearance of aspects of your own Being.
You cannot see this personally if you keep the body as form and say, 'I am constrained by this, and now how can I experience this?' Sometimes we do that. 'I want to experience this, and in that, I want to experience this.' We are already taking up the paradigm of being the body, you see. Without the 'I want,' what are you? Without being a reference point for yourself, making a limitation, the constriction about yourselves, what are you now? What is inside or outside you? And this is not natural to us because it took a long time actually to learn this, to pose as if I am this body. It took a lot of conditioning from my parents, from this mind, from all the other mouths. But I continue to be the whole, and my death is the death of everything. My sleep is when everything goes to sleep. My waking is the waking up of everything. My dance is the dance of everything. But even when everything is awake or asleep, I remain as the witness of all things, unchanged, untouched.
Read more (13 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
So, I have done the impossible. I have already jumped over the moon by believing that I could be limited. Now I'm just jumping back to my originalness, you see. So, this jump backwards to my individuality has been the one that took effort. The jumping over the moon to the truth is completely effortless. It is my original state now. Okay, you want to be the cow that jumped over the moon? Yeah, you jumped already. Jump now. Then are you going to buy this, what the mind is saying now? Are you going to remain in your reality? No effort is needed. Nothing has to be believed. Nothing has to be dropped also. Always naturally one. The false has managed to hide the moment you actually are way beyond even the most glorious beliefs you can have about yourself. The mind cannot fathom your glory. The mind cannot let up. The mind is just a peddler of positions of limitation. But because this feeling is there of oneness, tell me, how long will we rely on this circumstantial evidence, another appearance, to define who we are? There is nobody here. What is now gone, and which is gone? I don't have to find myself. I have this. I cannot find the false one. What is your reality? This Being cannot find the one that wants to find the Self. What to do? The one that wants to find the Self... I will give you the Self if only I could find you.
Yesterday after satsang, we played this little game. I said, 'Hasn't this... this guy who goes by the name of the ego... I'm looking for the guy. Okay, looking for the guy. And this happens when I look, and that happens when I look.' So I said, 'Who is the guy?' So seriously, just simply, if I said there's a guy sitting in the next room and he wants a pizza, maybe first time you believe me because my voice has some credibility. But after five pizzas, will you not want to conclude for yourself that there is no guy? So we've been giving this guy pizzas for many years. He's eating all this stuff. Then our educator, the voice of the mind, says, 'Really, well, come back later. Something will happen to you if you see him.' So please don't... 'Get out of my way, Master.' I said, 'There is no guy. Would you go and check for yourself?' This is the beautiful part about having the Master. I said, 'This mind is coming: no, no, but... but... no, but this... that you are my real Master.' I said, 'That is not true.' What you see then, we walked into the room, we saw there is nobody there. The mind will have a funny trick just to say, 'Oh, it's you. You have always been that.' Correct. But you are not a guy or a girl. You are that which is beyond all things.
As I said, the mind has only one trick: to convince you that God is a person, that Being that you are aware of is a limited entity. How do we reconcile this with undeniable samsaric presence? So I said, you cannot reconcile this now. If you present yourself as one who is living in samsara, that is the cause of all the trouble. Samsara is living in you. In your light, automatically it is moving. That includes this body, the words that come out of this mouth, the movement of these hands and feet—everything is included in the samsaric play of this world, you see. If you present yourself just as the part of the samsara and then you want to reconcile that, what does the free one who now has to reconcile with the rest of the world... that cannot happen. So that is still the position of limitation. The coconut trying to be the ocean, saying, 'How do I deal with the rest of this?' Samsara is coming in your light, and this light knows what it is doing.
You are completely aware of this truth, and you cannot convince the non-existent false one about this. That which is aware of samsara, that which is aware of the appearance of this world, is not trying to reconcile. Samsara only when it links itself to be something like an object in this world, can you try to reconcile. There are enough objects in the world, there are enough objects in this world which are available to tell other objects in this world how to live humanly, objectively. But satsang is not for that. But Guruji does not deny that he is living in this body. Who told you? Did he say he is living only in this body and he doesn't live in all the other bodies? No doubt that very much. It is no denying that it is the one Being that animates this body, but the same thing that animates all bodies. He said consciousness has to discover its true nature. That is the design of this world. That is the play of this world. In terms of the me of the appearance of this world, this is how it appears. But the one that discovers the truth does not see that it is exclusive to this one, except maybe a sign of encouragement for you, that aspect of consciousness which is still playing at the deluded one.
It's like we do this as a metaphor. I don't like to use the word 'ego.' It's like, if I tell you a hundred times 'I love you,' and then one time I tell you 'I hate you,' now are you really hating? Really? This is a good thing if you don't want to go with that which confirms our separation, our individuality, and to be in denial of that which is what apparently... to some Guruji says there is just one. This one Being animates this guy, animates you. Are you going to remember that? That has no value to the mind right now, you see. He said he is living in his body. Yeah, but this is not resolved. Although his letters is that one of existence itself. What is 'I exist' by them? As it says in the Bhagavad Gita, it is written: it cannot be said the Self exists or the Self does not exist either, because beyond these notions of even existence or non-existence is the existence of the Self. Pranam, it is easy. The sense of existence, 'I am,' is also up in the tree for the Self. This is the aspect which is coming into that which is aware. It is beyond even the sense of existence, and yet it is not untrue because nothing cannot be aware. It is that aware nothing. It is prior to existence, and therefore it exists because it is aware, but it doesn't exist because it is prior to existence itself. Who I am itself. What some Guruji said: 'Before I am, I am.' As more existence itself, there is something before that. It exists, yes, but is it subject to existence? No more. It is not. Before 'I am' is nothing. I was going to say like an empty glass, but even an empty glass is not empty; it is full of the potential for something. That is the one that exists because existence is used to define this terms of existence of consciousness. You are that which exists beyond existence, that means which is the only sense of existence itself. 'I am' is the light of this universe, but you are aware of even this one. You are the light of even this light, and this light is also only your own, a reflection of your own light. Let this be your own experience. Don't put them into the compartments of concepts, because then they will become confusing. The truth can be found now. Explore that which is aware of your existence and you tell me whether that exists. What does it mean, that which is aware of?
The sense that means which is the only sense of existence itself, 'I am,' is the light of this universe. But you are aware of even this one. You are the light of even this light, and this light is also only your own, a reflection of your own light. Let this be your own hands, Alex. Don't put them into the compartments of concepts, but then they will become confusing. The truths can be found now. Explore that which is aware of your existence and you tell me whether that exists. What does it mean, that which is aware of your existence? You can see it doesn't exist; only then you can say it exists. Just seen, it is not applicable. No oneself, no emotion, and that I'm changing seven to be me. No team happiness, and yet the seeming appearance of my existence appears as 'I am.' So from one perspective, because I remained untouched, unchanged, nothing has ever happened because I have to mean that's what I always was. And yet with the appearance of this 'I am,' it's some kind of game and death at sea and reeking in three, all of this. But I have been named on TV. You do this play of existence is born on. I'm that with this clear existence. I swallow it. I come to me back to the 90 minutes and I don't mean of that existence beyond existence before 'I am.' These words are not telling you the truth, but they are pointing you through your most reality to the best that can be done in words because this 'I' that we call is not the 'I' as a distinction between 'I am' you. I speak of one 'I.' Okay, back in your onion. Oh good.
Let me put this way, and then says 'I am' also looks alien when you tip series within 'I am' on little. Let it look it in here. Now speak something for, type something possible. You go to see 'I am' as alien to me. It's only within 'I am.' This is the 'I am' that you must, your own existence, which is the light of all things, which is the mother of this universe. Only then 'I am' we can say we have this game.
Father, I once, what would you say that you, that one maybe once a before hundred heroes? But you and Luigi and so many other appear to be the cards now. 'I am' is hurting me now. Anything is getting very accelerated. This is my second of the Buddha or with the light of this book bounty is indeed influence.
Now don't worry about these things which are based on time and spirits. You find the Buddha which is your home being trafficking and booty. Let's all say what's happening here. Come on, sit for one video. Look at that. There are 400 of us. No, everything is possible in consciousness. We can say certain things from how they have been in the past for the experience of what has been tasted and remember consciousness loves freshness. So when Lehman come and 'I am' that wanted to get all away one day, this tonight and we'll go to speak two minutes within the belly of the nothing there. It cannot be. But as long as I am here, all of this speaking will happen. All activity is the speaking of Maya is the movement of 'I am.' What is this is not moved? Yes, that's what I say every teacher. Okay, we keep going to the battery died, so presume I said bye, I love you, all those things.
I'm looking at these questions. Guruji, always outcomes if I will disappear after bodily death even or something it will disappear. You have to be there something to appear. You have to be there for something to disappear. You have to the power. When we say something disappeared, unless there was a witness of the disappearance, you see? So the disappearance will happen this again. So all that, and if you are not there you do witness appearance and disappearance, then nobody'll ever know about it. Okay, let me make it some sure that witnesses return. And if we want to experience itself as something as 'I am' is also clear. As long as it likes the post, a time and space are nothing for it. It has many realms and what is unclear is as it works one that you are finding as the real 'I.' Tell me interact the quality of appearing and only that which appears disappears. And everything in fact that which appears will disappear. But tell me if you find this one, but they were up here was it wrong that it will die? Does it have any qualitative an interview which is affected by appearance or disappearance or birth and death? None of this applies. Either this will be terms phenomenal down to not apply to the reality of you.
I just came across something, I think it was Master Ashtavakra, then he even sages cannot read almost nothing.
Yes, I remember this version. Ashtavakra. So why plays anyone? Your knowledge gets zero when you want. Concepcion 100% reverence for your own insult. Zero value something which is this earth except to the extent of any pointers for us to change value only to that which you found as your truth, yourself. Because if you just remain the federal knowledge spunky tell it, it is activating the spiritually, do you see? And this ability living in these pens no everyone except you. So how to listen to such best? Is it more than just to do or this is that it's high schools? It might keep quiet. We mean let your sense of being 'I am' not associated with any notion or something. If that is your understanding of the fire, then some is for them to introduce you to your motionless existence. Honeyford uncontaminated being history, you would say that is why all the pointers I guess so. Let there is some pointers which are operating on something and reading them out and some pointers we are encouraging you to just let all of this whoa whoa hold on to any mental story, any mental concept of a mechanical and in this motionlessness where truth is completely of gravity that is how it becomes the company of difference like this at sometimes that isness.
Yeah, who isn't threatened now that you have to type so much business? A lot until you see nothing is happening to me. See, I have no means that clean the life slaps us about. This is happening to me, when will this stop? If it is truly open, I think that within your heart that this is a plane then safely then know that everything this play is just masters down. I like this move and I don't like this man. I hope this one goes alright that the baby was based on keywords. Matt will sleep soon unless plugged into a power outlet. Thank you all so much for woman's attempt to be that. Guruji Mooji Baba Ki Jai.