राम
All Satsangs

How to Deepen in Humility

8:14320 views

Saar (Essence)

Ananta teaches that any sense of being a 'something' is pride, suggesting that since total ego-dissolution is rare, the safest identity to adopt is that of a humble servant or beggar.

To take yourself to be something, when in actuality there is no such me, is pride.
The safest refuge of an identity we can take is the foolish beggar servant.
This 'me' only brings trouble; all that is insightful and loving comes from God's grace.

intimate

humilityspiritual prideegospecialnessmayaidentityst. teresa of avilaself-inquiry

Transcript

This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.

Seeker

I was reading in this book that you gave me to read, St. Teresa in the Interior Castle. Yeah, I was just reading on the plane here that she speaks about this humility, which I don't really manifest. I lack in humility.

Ananta

You see, all of us do. So even to take yourself to be specially lacking in humility is specialness. Maybe even to take yourself to be specially lacking in humility is specialness, not humility. None of us is humble enough because you still take the 'me' to be something. This 'somethingness' is pride, yeah? So to take ourselves to be something, whereas in actuality there is no such 'me', and to take that nothing to be something is pride. So whether you call it ego, pride, resistance, humility, or lack of humility, it's all the same.

Seeker

So how to deepen in that? Yes, that was my question. I appreciate your guidance and help.

Ananta

Yes. So we saw what the problem is. The problem is that we take ourselves to be something. Is it? Now, has anyone fully dropped that anywhere in this room or anywhere? Because no one has fully dropped that, you see, when we look at their life over a lifespan. Moment to moment, of course, it is completely possible to fully drop that, and that is where the true insight of what you truly are is available. But this Maya, this place, this hallucination seems to be so compelling that even the greatest sages, moment to moment, may identify with the mind, and therefore we can say that nobody in this human condition has fully dropped that identification.

Ananta

So that somethingness that we take ourselves to be, especially when it takes the form of spiritual pride—that 'I'm better because I'm spiritual' or 'I have spiritual accomplishments' or 'I'm a spiritual achiever of some sort'—or even the fact that 'I'm a spiritual seeker' can become a source of pride, isn't it? That 'all of you are chasing all these materialistic things, but I am chasing God,' you see? So that can make it seem special. So what to do with that somethingness? What is the most accurate depiction of this 'me' that we can find in the human condition?

Read more (4 more paragraphs) ↓
Ananta

So what am I saying? If we are going to take ourselves to be something, what is the safest 'something' that we can take ourselves to be besides the truth of who you are? You see, everyone takes themselves to be something other than the truth, especially when life pushes our buttons. So, 'I Am' is the truth of what you are. That which is 'I', which is 'Am-ing', is the absolute reality of what you are, you see. But because nobody in the human condition remains empty 100%, suppose that you are the greatest sage and you take yourself to be only your reality, therefore you don't pick up any falseness, any avidya. Suppose 99.9% you are open and empty, you remain in the Unborn. That 0.1%, if you take yourself to be something super special—a mahani Maharaj—then that can actually undo the other 99.9% because with that 0.1% you can cause enough trouble in the world and to your brothers and sisters that they actually may turn away from God rather than towards God, you see.

Ananta

So if it can happen in the lives of the greatest sages, in our life it is much more; it is not 99.9 versus 0.1. So what is the safest refuge of an identity that we can take for that point-whatever percentage of time that we still identify? Yes, the beggar-servant. With integrity. Not just as an antidote to pride, but with integrity to see, to do an audit and see: okay, there is God's presence, there is God's light. What in our life is a gift of that, and what is the 'me' really bringing? And if you truly were to see, you will find that this 'me' only brings trouble, only brings suffering, only brings trouble to ourselves and to everyone around us, you see.

Ananta

So if this one is such a troublemaker, such a problematic one, then to take itself to be a foolish beggar-servant is the only acceptable position where it can cause the least amount of trouble. Now, would we wish that this part would 100% go away? Of course. Of course you would. There is nobody like that. In the moments of true insight, we notice there is no such 'me', you see. And yet, in some of you who have been in more than a decade of Satsang, have we been able to lose this 'me' completely? All it takes is a little bit of a button-push from a special relationship or somewhere. It doesn't even have to be a special relationship; it could be somebody shouts at you on the road, is it? Then that 'me' comes.

Ananta

So for this identity, for this conditioning of 'somebody special', 'somebody important', 'somebody who achieved something', to be replaced with a truer seeing—that that which I've taken myself to be is just so foolish and not insightful and not loving and not heartfelt—because all of that comes from God's grace, from the Atma.

The Thread Continues

These satsangs touch the same silence.