Do You Want to Be Happy or Right? - 20th September 2018
Saar (Essence)
Ananta uses the negation of all concepts, roles, and dualities to dismantle the ego's conceptual framework. He points toward a wordless reality where even the assertion of non-duality is seen as a limitation.
To non-duality cannot be that which is the opposite of duality; it is not opposed to anything at all.
If you can forget the pair of opposites, that is more of a reality than saying 'I am Brahman'.
These words are meant to do the cleanup job, shaking out concepts until you are left with wordless reality.
contemplative
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
I shall explain the existence-consciousness-supreme bliss, which is ever joy by its own. It is by itself and there is no difference, no duality. All pairs of opposites characters—no difference and nothing divided of differences. This alone, supreme Dhamma, affliction is unattainable by knowledge. No question, not even now shall know either. There is no veil, anything as this alone am I. Nothing that is decayless, nothing beyond the beyond. This alone, there is no outside, no inside, no either will or no form. This alone, there is no truth, none who has renounced or comes, no corruption of values. This alone, there is no quality of qualified statement, no mental attitude, no japa, no limitation. Nothing pervading and under you fools, no, there is no Guru, no disciple. Nothing fixed, nothing auspicious or inauspicious, nothing uniform or a different form. No liberation, custom, or the real machine article, no.
There is no meaning for the word 'Aham' or the word 'Tat'. Those senses are the objects or doubt. Nothing traveling, no thirty-two or anything means. There is nothing of the form of peace or non-duality, nothing above or below or trade. No sorrowful body for pleasure and nothing tickle. There is no body, no sign, nothing caused by the cause or the absence of cause or sorrow for conclusion. Nothing mysterious and boat on selected steams. There is no karma that is accumulated or that is yet to be realized. There is no base, hell, no conclusion or liberation and nothing purifying. No craving or learning or I, no knowledge and no deity. Not even not still, not a good nickname.
There is no sign of the auspicious or inauspicious, no death, no life, no satisfaction. Nothing enjoyable, no undivided unitary essence. Now there is no villain or world or wakefulness or sovereignty, not even a trifle of the defect of equality. Whatever for delusion of counting the food station, there is not all on if you think adorable, no morality. Don't worship the world, no relative or a mixture of others' hearings, no sense. There is no such time or the lack of sense, no Brahman, no inquiry. Don't actors on speaker, there is no merit or there is simply no actions, positive acts. Nothing related to the Self, nothing related to the physical, nothing related to the divine. There is no birth or death anywhere, no states of waking, dream, and sleep.
There is no ritual, no fear for sexuality, no quintet unthinkable woman guilty or the delusion of sacred. There is no peace where there is nothing whatsoever it releases. Nothing of the 'I' anyway, nothing what is called Maya, nothing associated with my molar Jesus anywhere in the least or persecution of them. There is no experiences of deep sleep or false tears, no proper motions here or the hilemon. There is—this is indeed supreme Dhamma, a frictionless vector.
There is no Jiva, food on the sheets or five layers or mind or that which is not cheese. Though she is a ventilator which he took as there is nothing of the form of instruction, nothing to be instructive, done to teach you is only usually. It is not be persecuted and persecute being elusive, both conclusive knowledge based on the triads: knower, knowable, and you. You like it with the rest of my sentence. These are words after a little bit of commentary. You nicely, you could see it. If you could see it, just saying space, but it seemed that this latest thing, it's not like anything special, right? It's just something they got. She's like every time it comes to share, it seemed a bit of shame. I feel like on my minuscule at this IP constriction about what is allowing that he is speaking of is that which is active, the holding back and allows the duality of this even it is not even to take the position.
Read more (15 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
So I don't want to say necessarily that okay, you must allow. How do you think that either of those, if you can make the term itself with relevant a movie? It's a great forgetfulness in the sense of forgetting what these terms imply. Who's using these terms? We seem to apply it to our experience position that leaves so that allowing the traitor so again in this play, it seems as if once we take on this position that something seems to replicate that position in the outward expression as well. But we don't have to worry about that is basic itself, but that's how we make it. This is what's allowing, but I'm saying these dogs is we love this big baton itself will be irrelevant and the idea that you could allow or you could be true if you want to forget about that exist.
The people you know, you have this notion that 'I am not with you,' 'No, I'm not allowing feel,' 'I should do not know,' 'I should be on this long.' Is there that sense of with that? And you can—it can never be that fully long is in the sense that there is a doership about it that I can do it or not do it, like I'm doing the closing model. Even the fully looking that you are conceptualizing you can never actually your experience because you have the notion of this doership in some sense. But if you deal it since, don't become averse to it but just leave the concept of it. Leave the effort, make the effort and honestly, if the doership and on doing about the opposites is what an attractive country and no language is not designed for what I'm trying to convey.
So it seemed like a bit of work struggle sometimes to use it as long as you have the idea that 'I must fully allow,' that is not the full allowing anyway because your doership is still involved in that. The idea that phase or some separate entity who has the position to be able to do that is through there, which is not the full allowing anyway. So if you can forget the pair of opposites, so beautiful to be poor kind of God said that is more of a reality even though I am Brahman skip she's ketchup because because even the statement 'Aham Brahmasmi' means even that statement there is a potential that I could not be, you see? If it is just naturally that, we don't need to state anything at all. Even though the time to state there you are giving some credence to the possibility that an opposite could exist. That's why I have to affirm that I am.
Like we don't move around asserting 'I have a face,' 'I have a nose,' anything. But if we did go around asserting there, that gives an openness to the possibility and I could not have a nose, you see? So the same way if you keep asserting something, it is almost giving in to the plane of duality again. Not saying that I because you say that to anyone, what is the same? Of course you do. And then if there is there a possibility that you could? So when you assert that 'I am this consciousness,' it is in that affirmation itself which may be useful of course at some point, but the time is awesome we are having now. Even that assertion in great into it is the possibility that it could actually do oops, you could actually be separate you.
So non-duality cannot be that which is the opposite of duality. We are outside to clear your offices. It is not opposed to anything at all. Your Self is not with opposition. That is why repeating these things, what does it mean? Thing a Self is not in opposition to anything at all, therefore in a sense it is completely in observance but north heart is everything. The Self is not like the asserting itself or denying anything. It is the version, the mental version of what is a conversion of business. He took these verses because it's constructed you know. Thank you Divine Being because you could be talking water. There is more last, there is suddenly there is no. It shows us that we need this steak is of meaning and some more of her role being so I am eating but to mix it all up you could be talking about the most mundane thing. No bar cheesy first those days to move on the secret one see no bars no money. I like the way my lips like because all these terms are meaningless.
Is it possible to get caught up in this? I got youth meeting you assuming that different different levels of reality at the enmity so composition Chile more and more every time we read it I find them I get it this time although some critics curators from each snow forced writing gradually building those concepts which are so directly right into that because it isn't scripture it says it is no scripture.
Jesus also I feel it's bit relevant to speak about why these nanostructures were kept in secret. She was young she which means the secret of Shiva secrets. This is just one tiny look this entire picture the tiny aspect of the she goes with Rose she realized and these were kept hidden in the ashram they were kept secret caves why? Because if you make concepts about these things it like there is no much to make that into a concept itself. There is no there is no there is no there is no disciple. If you create a conceptual framework out of this because these are very, very beautiful pointers to that wordless reality. It takes some special kind of words to come to shake you all of these concepts because you can take these position you can use these words also to make position which are so then strong will take life has to bring some special events in a way to check visa Indian history or stories whatever you like of it.
There are many representation business we learn it structurally unit once then became so egoistic spiritually used because we were holding on to these concepts which were meant to do the cleanup job that itself compactor switch truly glad to be chicken once really because here the Lord had to come down as a non-target check out this to touch people they all the right things we know we saying everything scripture do what it is they can be individualistic. So I do have a sense woody why this these kind of but they'll improve a little help you lose any time you find yourself becoming heavy arrows maybe you asleep about anything this time with a lady holding on to something concept it is good most of you can see a guy's system becomes lighter like this. It's what you do in find it mainstream that all our concepts are being charmed you be left with her received acknowledgement window box fields refresh inside the pen while the bath is going on concepts of being shaken out of you.
It might not always be like a bomb if I feel like this frustration this didn't II love this question of language operation actually trying to be right pressing yourself by trying to be like this exists so strange that maybe we make ourselves suffer is it trying to be liked seems to be you want to be happy or do you want to be right? You are too late an occlusive of you yes I feel like her the channel so we can be as quiet as disco you know you see them at that point now that aren't able to stand the same whatever excuse you might have I mean might even have to questions it's change that Luiza for the new type you and saying yes but in this play you need this maybe this didn't resist like instead of saying it is coming so all this knowledge of chapter 26 it is said there are no sweets using minutes is not then it's using that logic none of the sixes therefore I did not need it but when it exists in you and then you need chance to divine I mean this is who they ultimately said that one means fashions they even see ultimately is not finding it it says smoke do I live on mountains it's not so that's in anything to just it doesn't have any alligator will sense that and you're gonna be wrong take a position but you can just thank you come on go come on anything I mean the that what explaining to is not found enough why are you struggling so much is it would even th
I mean, this is what they ultimately say, that one means fashions. They even see ultimately it's not finding it. It says, 'Must I live on mountains?' It's not so. That's in anything. It just doesn't have any... I will sense that and you're going to be wrong. Take a position, but you can just thank you, come on, go, come on, anything. I mean, that what explaining to is not found enough. Why are you struggling so much? Is it even that's the truth? Because everything is position-making. Yeah, no idea that why I study with all of this one. I can't just be. How do we, how do they try to just be? Because it happened. Do you work this for me? It's like this cleanup job doesn't happen, or even this position of trying to just be like what you say. Need to try to be natural, but actually this is fun but positional. I obviously something relaxed around to that.
This is an important point to make because sometimes the words of satsang and the words like 'just be' are very frustrating. And then we can take on this move so that 'I don't need any of this, I'm just going to be.' I just have to be. Within that position itself, your bondage is already almost everywhere. While we started, I have to, oh, two, three things I have to itself here. This is you, but empty of the motion of trying to just be. Yeah, in the heart, that is exactly you notice. That's a little piece of work there. Also put a bit nothing, nothing. Also can you do nothing? This appeal, how to say, listen, it is just that the concept of doership itself does not apply to you actually. As long as you have the idea of 'I do' or 'I not do,' they are getting into the type of a limited concept about Brahman.
If I say do nothing, 'do nothing' into a plane leaving this realm of activity, it is just taken some part of this level and we make a report about ourselves first on the activity in that aspect of that realm, and then we get into that thing. Okay, so what should that, how should that exhibit itself? So if you take five deep breaths, so she said she reaches like that, you know, this kind of thing. But in that also, it is inherent truth about what you are. Slick's unnecessarily. No, I think you know that couple of times I can buy foundation of it is not the foundation where if it's like Russians have some possessions only the city needs you. You say some things operation you've also done in his life. If you have the sense that you're doing, you free. This is like you have no time to come into any position today.
As I am speaking then, like moment to moment, it was just so. You know, in a way that is a great lesson about life. Now there is a parallel between that and Sanskrit as opposed to English. Like in English, you process the entire world in a wheel and then you pronounce. So if it's a long word, if we never miss foot water, if I wear it isn't the new xpl reduction, 'supercalifragilisticexpialidocious,' the syllables in the way they are pronounced are different. You have to know at least parts of the word you can pronounce. For Sanskrit, right, sometimes your means how is rather doing that? Long words which are coming so naturally. Something we just have to be one only later. It's just that well, pronunciation between change based on how long the word is. It's completely for lighting. So it will not change if it's on let alone or it's a one-fifth. Let's just meet it, what is available.
With chanting also, you spoon this because you try to get all the mantras and 'what is this word in English transliteration?' It is, and I tell what I'm saying is that like for light foundation, if you're deciding that 'I'm just gonna take it moment,' but then you know that can't happen even if we didn't buy even that you season then it time. So you know we need to just, you know, like that. And if funny things can happen, it's not like everything is going to be perfect because of that. This idea has to be job. You will talk about so fun time and hours on creating a lie with that. It's like, you know, it's clear to you then that voice coming from there and this voice coming from here about just so. In some way it relates to what you see.
So the action was simply about this and I was simply... you can't decide to do it. Yeah, like typing. So what is that world in which flow and this week busy woods? Well, do we have time to show you which actually exists there? There is trouble only in the contradiction trying to come up with a conceptually coherent representation of what is actually beautiful concept. And it seems like it is question those are doing here. I have to say that all that I'm saying is after rain. I know even one thing is phenomenal. Oh, do you know? Like Eric water is not really come from this mouth of God. You, yeah. Thank you so much for being in satsang today. That Satguru Sri Mooji Baba, he seen 30 little clip macula nothing you you.