If you expect the self to be known as an object, that is never going to happen

So, one says when attention is on an object, can the cell be known? If you are expecting that the cell will be known as an object, then that is never going to happen. So, you write that attention is limited, so when it is on something else, then it cannot be at the same amount on something else. Everything is hard to become diffused blurry, but what I am sensing is that there is a misunderstanding about what the cell is, there is a misunderstanding that in the play of attention, the cell can be lost and found, and this is what we have tried to clarify, but I am happy to clarify this hundreds of more times, because this is where many, many, many get stuck.