Nitya-rāsa-līlā

Source search and identity control

The programme reports approximately forty-one handwritten folio pages and describes Ayodhyā, gardens, the palace and bowers, meeting, water recreation, and union. Exact and variant Internet Archive searches found no exact-work object. Three records called Madhur Padavali by Siya Ali were inspected rather than accepted by creator metadata: the actual introduction says their female poet is a different Siyā Alī from the author of Samaya-rasa-vardhinī and Nitya-rāsa-līlā.

Precise gaps

• No usable primary witness is digitally controlled; sixteen exact, variant, author, Archive, catalogue, and wider search families found no manuscript images.
• The programme reports approximately forty-one handwritten folio pages at Śrī Hanumat Nivāsa, but their current shelfmark, physical identity, location, condition, foliation, and exact extent are not verified.
• Three Archive records titled Madhur Padavali by Siya Ali belong to a different Siyā Alī; their own scanned introduction explicitly distinguishes the authors.
• The root opening, ending, complete colophon, contents, complete order, numbering, and repetition pattern remain unknown.
• The visible closing date—Jyeṣṭha dark fortnight 1, Vikrama Saṃvat 1929—is preserved without guessing whether it records composition, copying, or another event.
• The complete root has no scan-controlled transcription or complete fresh English translation.
• The eight visible documentary groups are programme examples, not canonical unit numbers.
• No complete standalone reader, print view, bilingual PDF, root facsimile, or root download is available.
• Scan 391 begins with the preceding work; scan 394 completes this work's last quoted group and then opens Śyāmasakhe kī Padāvalī.