Thinking is not the appearance of thought

We've been asked a question she said, Father, isn't thinking due to in-advocals? Only even isn't thinking due to in-advocals? Only even in non-sages? Yes. Well, let's define what we mean by thinking. Usually what I say in Satsang is that thinking is not the appearance of Thomas. You see, because these appearance of thoughts is coming, whether say is non-sages, doesn't really matter. Thinking is when we use the term thinking, we are including that belief in the thought, that condition that picking up of the identity. So, mostly in humanity what you see is that it is the standard operating procedure, so it is people. That we seem to follow the voice of this mind and the thoughts, believe most of what it is saying. But for a sage it is rare. So, you know, in-advocals, in the sense of the rarity of it. You see, that in a sage, sometimes there are beautiful stories like this.