A pointer is not the truth

But in itself, cannot be ever become a replacement for truth. So if the point, the truth will set you free or if the point that there is a ease of being, or there must always be a ease of being. Is it? If that is taken to be the truth in itself, then it will only bind. It will only oppress. But if it is again, there must be an ease of being always. If that leads us to discover the ease of being in this moment, then that is a useful point. What is the difference between pointer and truth? Totally different. Totally different. So pointers are just incomplete, expressions as every thought is, inconclusive, incomplete, but offering, completion, offering, an idea that I could just hold on to this as if it is the truth. But by God's grace and by His mercy, a pointer can lead us into a deeper looking, but without the deeper looking, it is as much lies as every other statement.