Truth Means That Which is Not Coming and Going - 1st February 2016
Saar (Essence)
Ananta points to the ever-present awareness that exists prior to all concepts and the sense of being. He encourages shifting from conceptual belief to direct experience, recognizing that the person is merely a mental merry-go-round.
Truth cannot be believed; only ideas can be believed. Truth is that which is not coming and going.
The mind is a merry-go-round that says ‘I’ll take you there,’ but it always leaves you at the start.
Who can say ‘I am not’ with integrity? The presence of consciousness is allowing even that thought.
contemplative
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
Right now, who am I? Before we can think about it, not 'Who am I?' before the concept can be picked up about it, before I need to define, before I have figured out why I am, you are. Isn't there? There is nothing missing in that. Before we pick up the idea of missing, before we pick up the idea that I am something, there is nothing missing. The witness suggests aware that I am, aware that I am. Not even before we can use the words 'I am.' When I am no captive to any of these concepts, the sense 'I am' is here. That which we call the waking state or the dream state, and it has our direct experience also, that the sense 'I am' is not there in that which we call the sleep state.
Why this can seem like a journey only is that for a long time we seem to be trying to convince our mind. We feel that convincing that which we believe ourselves to be is freedom. We feel that, 'If I completely believe that I am consciousness or I completely believe that I am awareness, then I will be free. And because I don't completely believe it yet, I am not there yet.' But this freedom doesn't need your belief, doesn't need our belief. It is prior to that. So that which needs belief can only be an idea. Only ideas can be believed in. Truth cannot be believed. And the ideas can be beautiful or they can be terrible, but they are only just ideas.
Before the idea 'I,' you are. Before your mind, who can say 'I am not' with integrity? I've seen so much conceptually, the types who can say 'I do not exist.' But they mean is that 'I don't exist personally,' yes. But they do exist as consciousness. Say, 'The I that I always believed myself to be has never existed, but the presence of consciousness is occurring and it is allowing to that I which is constantly here called awareness.' So when it's said 'I don't exist' or 'you don't exist at all,' it is referring to this idea of the separate entity. Otherwise, at best we are saying that 'I know I don't exist. I know this. See, I know that I don't exist. I saw, I saw that I don't exist, so clear I saw.' See what is happening? Where is the confusion?
Confusion only is that 'I saw that I don't exist as a phenomenal entity.' Person anyway long gone, because it's just an idea. That 'I don't exist as a phenomenal entity.' Who saw this? Or who knows this? Or who is aware of this? The knowingness of the awareness itself. So some might say that, 'Oh, I am aware that this is no more awareness. I know this, that even awareness was not there.' The knowingness itself that knows that something was not there or was there is awareness. So either it can be that when we say 'I don't exist,' we are talking about the non-existent idea that I had about myself, or it could be that we are talking about the phenomenal sense—even the sense 'I am.' I am not; I am that which is higher even to that. Or third, and most often, it is an observation type problem, so conceptual change. The words have been used in different ways and that leads to a lot of confusion.
But truth in itself means that which is not coming and going. The reality itself, you, that it is not coming and going. Appearances or Maya is that which is coming and going. So when it is said the realm of name and form—name means concepts, ideas; form means phenomenal appearances—so if Maya is the realm of name and form, then that which is aware of name and form must be nameless, formless. So then if awareness itself was coming and going, who would be aware of that?
Read more (7 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
Now the fourth confusion also sometimes can be that we confuse what is the—what I call the phenomenon—would seem to be the events. See, the phenomenal perceiving is only arising in the presence of 'I am' through the senses, the world. So the world uses awareness in this way: 'I'm aware of this glass, I'm aware of this concept.' That which is phenomenally perceived, obviously that is subject to the presence of being, so that is coming and going. But who knows of, or who is aware that phenomenal perceiving is happening? That is the awareness that we are talking about, not the phenomenal perceiving in itself. So sometimes if you use awareness in that sense of phenomenal perceiving, then of course we can say, 'Yes, even awareness is coming and going and it belongs to my being.'
The easiest way to unravel all of this for us as Satsang students is to be clear with our direct experience. Use whatever pointers are available to us in Satsang and check for ourselves: Is this directly what is experienced here? The entire point of the spiritual practice and self-inquiry is just to come to this direct experience of what we are. So what is our direct experience? Sleep is a direct experience. We don't have to learn about sleeping in a school, that 'this is how you sleep, this is what happens.' It's a very natural dissolution of the sense of being. And waking up is also direct experience. Not conceptually, there was a sense of being. This awareness was aware of itself. Then there is now, made up of awareness itself, the sense of being. With the birth of this sense of being, the entire circus starts. So much comes to life instantly. Its whole playing with all of its energies—metaphysical, physical—and it's all alluring in a way.
Very quickly we get involved with it. Very quickly we get involved with the identity of being the person and the body. But in Satsang and self-inquiry, we slow it down and we look. So what is happening here? Being came to be. What happened along with the birth of being? We noticed that there are also the forces of attention, of belief. There are these energies called thoughts, and the entire energetic creation that we call the world is present with all the forces of light, sound, gravity, electricity, all of this. But what happened to that awareness which is just aware of itself? Nothing happened to this awareness. It did not become an object within this phenomenal plane. All of this objectivity, phenomenology, is within it, but truth itself did not stop being aware. It remained untouched and unknown. This is the 'I' that is ever-present.
And just the reverse of this happens when we go to sleep. In a scripture it is said, just like the legs of the turtle, this world rolls back into itself. All of this sleep is coming, all of this rolls into being, and then being dissolves into that which it was always made up of, which is awareness itself. That is all that is going on. Everything else, if you say that there is something other than this, to me it seems to be just imagination, because for my direct experience, this is what we can speak.
Now what happens is, with the presence of being, then there can be this impulse towards conceptual understanding. Because of this realm of phenomenology, we use to understand using our mind conceptually. But Satsang needs to unravel that sort of understanding—that understanding which is unreliable. Any concept is not changing based on the concept that we have. The seeming life of the person changes with the concept that they carry. It seems to change like that. So that is why all this positive thinking and thinking positive, self-help and all that exists. 'Think happy thoughts.' Because the concepts that you carry seem to affect the person identity. What we would be saying here is that whether you have the most terrible thoughts or the best thoughts, the truth of what you are is not changing. So whatever conceptual understanding we might have ultimately actually does not matter.
Therefore, we must stop fighting about any conceptual understanding. 'Oh, his understanding is like this, his or her understanding is this, this is not compliant with my understanding.' Forget it. It's never about any conceptual understanding. Then the space that comes to look together only is from that sense of 'this is the way that I see it' and there seems to be somehow a disconnect with the way another sees it. Then that is a beautiful contemplation that we can have together, and it is something that I am always up for to utilize the surface which is appearing in the presence of being.
My mind is the merry-go-round. In these circles it says, 'I'll take you there, the final destination.' The merry-go-round! The buyer ticket says, 'Become a better person now, become like this, become like that.' Buy that ticket, you jump on the merry-go-round and it seems to be moving. So initially it can seem like we're making some progress, and then it starts turning back. Yes, turning around. You feel, 'No, no, no, I'm losing it. That way I was much better, a better person.' Yeah, and then it starts going back again, forward. So this merry-go-round, we realize that after a long time you started, you're just at the starting point. Then you say, 'I come to Satsang and I am going to get off this merry-go-round. I've seen this merry-go-round is not taking me anywhere. I'm going to get off.' So yeah, 'I'm not going to buy the mind ticket.' Then it comes back with another ticket: 'This is now, this is super now, you see? I'm going to take you to the super enlightened state.' Oh!
The Thread Continues
These satsangs touch the same silence.

On a similar theme
But... God is Here. - 9th March 2026
9 March 2026
Ananta teaches that God dwells within the heart, hidden only by the 'blanket of me.' He guides seekers to rest in the...

On a similar theme
The Repetition of the God’s Name Has the Power To Cut the Holds of Maya - 4th March 2026
4 March 2026
Ananta emphasizes that God dwells eternally within the temple of the heart, accessible not through conceptual pride or...

The following day
This Openness Is What I´m Pointing to - 2nd February 2016
2 February 2016
Ananta guides a seeker to move from the struggle of seeking peace to a natural state of openness. He emphasizes that...