Realizing the Truth Doesn’t Mean All Tendencies Drop Immediately - 6 April 2016
Saar (Essence)
Ananta guides the seeker to recognize their true identity as the unborn awareness prior even to the sense of existence. He clarifies that while recognition is instantaneous, the dissolving of conditioning is a gradual play of consciousness.
The true I is the unborn awareness, untouched even by the presence or absence of i am-ness.
Recognition of the truth is instantaneous, but the dropping of conditioning is a seemingly time-bound play.
Not a blade of grass moves without the will of consciousness; even rebirth is just its appearance.
intimate
Transcript
This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
So I want to ask one last question. This knowingness—I can't... a bigger... yes, this is only for the conversation's sake. Yes, still there is a question which crops up. Within this knowingness, I don't know if it comes from the mind or it comes from the general self-inquiry, there is a knowingness, only the knowingness. Where do I stand in all this? Where do I stand in all this? Who am I in all this? Either this 'Who am I' question has to actually, you know, get burned in the awareness, or there is no further question required. But still something comes up: Who am I actually, you know, in all this awareness, let's say?
So I will make it simple for you. I will give you the hypothesis that you are this awareness itself. Now you have to prove me wrong. You have to show me how this is not true. But I've just given you a submission; now you have to validate or invalidate it based on your direct experience. I am saying that the true 'I'—and you say 'Where am I in relation to this?'—is usually my question actually, but I'm happy you asked. So I'll give you the answer that this 'I' is this awareness or knowingness itself. Now you take this as a submission and you check this out.
In this awareness there is no 'I'. Yes, but you are there. Only if I look, if 'I' looks into 'I', then I am. Otherwise there is no 'I'. Who knows there is no 'I'? Okay, for the further language sake... I know, not language sake really, who knows? He literally... I tell you what the trouble is. I'll tell you what the trouble is. You are used to using 'I' for this body-mind. Now when I say that you and reality, this 'I' in reality is awareness itself, you see there is no 'I' here. What it means when you say there is no 'I' here means there is no body-mind functioning here, isn't it? No, I thought you are out, not really sort of like that. See, but one question says... I don't know, I mean this is in Hindi of course, so otherwise... oh kindly excuse me others because this is in my own language. Okay. Main sab jaanti hoon, main sthit ho ke apne aap ko... I mean there is no separation as such. There is just one who actually is absorbed into himself. And this absorption, when I say 'I', there has to be something before 'I'. I mean whatever you call it as a presence or awareness. When I say 'I', even if it is not mind and body, even if it is 'I am', my own existence... I am prior to existence because I am prior to existence actually. Because there is no existence actually, there is just no existence. I mean to say that there is an existence itself is a kind of an expression.
So that's what I was coming to next, which was that first we are so used to relating to ourselves as the body-mind, and then you say that in this awareness I find that there is no body-mind movement. Then you say that even the sense 'I am' at best is just an appearance within this awareness, or we can say in front of this awareness, whatever. So this awareness is untouched even by the presence or absence of I am-ness. Now this one, I see if the real 'I' as Bhagavan said, it is the 'I' from which is born the 'I-I' which you used to call the 'I-I' and reduced to the 'I am'. So this, as Bhagavan said, remains, which is prior even to the sense of existence. You are absolutely right, you see. But is this your own direct knowing of this? It is not something just imagined or some concept from a scripture. You are having the direct insight of this, isn't it? It is not anyone else's. It is not the body-mind's. It is not even belonging to presence, not even belonging to consciousness. This is completely prior to personhood and prior even to 'I am'. And this is the truest 'I'. But you cannot separate from this as hard as you may try, as hard as the mind may try. You cannot become anything else but this awareness itself.
Yes, yes, that is an experience. Then where is the nothingness in this? This awareness is no-thing, isn't it? That's why even Guruji says that sometimes the mind misunderstands 'nothing' to mean that it is a negative nothing; actually it is the 'no-thing' from which everything comes. So if I have this direct experience, then how is it that, you know, there is not so much clarity and there are still doubts and there are still questions? Why? Why are they there?
Read more (11 more paragraphs) ↓Show less ↑
Yeah, that's why it's very important. It's a little subtle, so all of you must pay attention to what I am saying. The recognition of what I really am always happens in an instant. Every time we check, you ask the question 'Am I aware now?' This recognition of my truest nature is available to us. But it doesn't always happen with this instantaneous recognition that all my conditioning gets dropped away. It happens very rarely like that, that in one recognition all conditioning is dropped away. What usually happens is every time there is this recognition, some part of the misbelief in myself as a person is chopped off. A big chunk of this is chopped away, then there can be some like laughing and crying happening, what we usually call an awakening experience, you see. It's nothing but a big chunk of the conditioning being bitten off. But for some it flows like this, big chunks are going, and for some it is dissolving soberly. And either are okay. Either are okay.
So although the recognition of the truth is instantaneous, we have the idea that once the truth is seen, all of our prior conditioning should be dropped away. Actually, all will never be dropped away, not even for the sages, not even for the Avatars. All is never dropped away. But you will find that most of it is going as we continue to come to Satsang. And that is why I say that you are free right now in reality, but you must keep coming to Satsang. When you get confused by this, you see, the point is that the first part is the recognition of the reality of what you are, and the second part is seemingly time-bound in this play: the dropping of the conditioning. So the mind tries to correlate the two things: 'Okay, if I see the truth, then why am I still this conditioned? Why is there suffering? Why are my attachments still not going?' Thinking like this itself is adding on fresh conditioning. So this recognition is very useful to drop conditioning, but with no expectation that in one short finger-snap everything should go away.
So how did it go for you? It was not a finger-snap?
Although when I sat in front of Guruji there was a chunk that he just took away, a big chunk of the conditioning, but then also over a period of time. And I must be honest and with integrity tell you that it is a continuous ongoing process which continues to this day. Nobody can tell you that 'I am one hundred percent free from conditioning.' Even Ram cried when Sita was taken away. Even Jesus said on the cross, 'Oh Father, have you forsaken me?' You see, momentarily the play of conditioning will always happen.
I understand. But the devotion which comes out, is this a pure emotion, not a conditioned emotion which comes out? So you'll be able to enjoy all results, you know, those nine Rasas and everything. You'll be able to... this Maya becomes a Leela actually. But if you see, Adi Shankaracharya has written... what you are... he says totally different. When he says he is nothing actually, while if you see the Avadhuta Gita, he talks positive: 'I am this, I am that.' He does not say 'Neti, Neti, Neti.' So different ones have different expressions actually. It is the same stuff. But where is the time? I mean the body can fall next moment. Where is the time to actually, you know, go in a very slow process? Where is the time?
The play of conditioning is also a play that Consciousness is playing. There is no need to worry about time because time and space are also in service to Consciousness. You know, in one seemingly one-minute dream you can dream up an entire lifetime. So as much as space is a projection, time is also a projection. So God is not worried about time.
Yeah, but as we believe that there is a reincarnation, I don't want to be reborn. That is what they say: Mukti. Every Indian knows Mukti and they say, I mean, it's basically no rebirth. Yeah, some say it's a liberation from the conditioning. So as of now I'm not liberated from conditioning. I don't know what is birth and what is rebirth. Then where is Mukti for me? It is just a recognition. Where is Mukti for me? Why is there still somebody actually, you know, who wants Mukti?
Yes, yes. And even the recognition does not belong to this one who is saying 'Where is the Mukti for me?' That is not bothered at all. That is not bothered at all. It doesn't know 'me' at all. So if that is the recognition, that that is my true nature, and this is unconcerned with Moksha and that which arises in service to this Consciousness... not a blade of grass moves without the will of God. That most problem is also Mukti only belongs to Consciousness... sorry, I did not catch that.
Yes, yes, I am saying that you say that the truth of what I am is unconcerned with this sort of liberation, Nirvana. True. And this Consciousness which is arising in service to this reality of what you are—not a blade of grass moves without the will of this Consciousness. Rebirths and non-rebirths, the cycle of birth and death, all of this is all a play of Consciousness. And it will not happen without the will of this Consciousness. And you are coming to the realization that 'I am that I am,' and actually 'I am that which is beyond even this I am.' You yourself are saying it. Then this one that is saying 'I want Mukti now, I want...' like that, that one's having the tantrum now. It is neither of these. It is neither of these. So let's not give too much attention to this one. Let's not give too much belief to this one.
Okay. Because I know, you know, Lakshmana Swami... I was reading your bio that he had an adopted daughter. He still has an adopted daughter. Yes. And the way in fact, you know, she got it was that she was seeing Shiva actually, you know, in the throne inviting her and all stuff. I think probably others may not like it because they don't know the story. And then finally when she actually, you know, surrendered to the Guru's feet, then Lakshmana Swami said that either she would have been born as a goddess if she had gone on to that with Shiva, or this 'I', this 'I' would have got the rebirth. So this rebirth is actually of the 'I'. I'm not debating it because it is coming from a realized master. So what needs to be reborn is basically the 'I' which goes from the one birth to the second birth. Now this is a small 'I', I suppose. That is a condition, right? Is that so?
Okay. The true 'I' is the unborn. It is neither one nor many. The 'I am' is coming and going, and every coming and going actually you can call rebirth. You can call every day also rebirth. How you know that you were in this body-mind being as this body-mind anytime prior to this? Even in the dream we have a memory of yesterday and 'I know these people.' You see, let's not worry too much about these concepts. Rebirth is just the presence of the I am-ness and the absence of I am-ness and the presence of the I am-ness again. So we die and we are born again every time this 'I am' is dissolving or it's coming back. So this appearance and disappearance of I am-ness must be birth and death actually. But the real 'I' is unborn.
The Thread Continues
These satsangs touch the same silence.

On a similar theme
But... God is Here. - 9th March 2026
9 March 2026
Ananta teaches that God dwells within the heart, hidden only by the 'blanket of me.' He guides seekers to rest in the...

On a similar theme
The Gateway to the Heart Temple - 2nd March 2026
2 March 2026
Ananta teaches that while God cannot be found in worldly objects, the soul is designed to reveal the Divine through the...

The following day
Guidance on Difficulty with Inquiry - 7 April 2016
7 April 2016
Ananta guides seekers to move beyond mental answers like "me" or "I am the self" by inquiring into the witness of these...