Neutrality of Beingness - 23th May 2017

How do you speak about it? If you can't look at it, it seems to the mind as the most boring, deathly thing. I was saying that to speak of it intellectually is actually impossible in a way, because when you try to explain it to the mind, it's unfathomable. Anything the mind interprets is in the realm of opposites. I say you don't have to do anything; nothing is needed for freedom. But does the mind understand that? It says, 'I am going to stop. I am going to talk to me.' It doesn't understand that doing and nothing-doing are also in the realm of opposites. With neutrality, clicking between them is cool, but the action of the body—action or inaction of the body—is it simply an addition to the reality of what I am? This the mind cannot see, because the mind only operates on phenomenal objects. And it's a misconception that you are a phenomenal object in the world of phenomenal objects. This is a world of qualities, of attributes, so we keep looking for this freedom as an attribute of the freedom. Speak objectively: this body you will come to hear, for this mind to come see it. Is that the totality of your existence? And if it is not the totality of existence, if there is something beyond body and mind, does that mean it can be bound in any way? Which I saw with me anymore what this whole trip is about then.

First is the simple recognition: Am I just the body and the mind? Is there something beyond that I am? And if there is something beyond that I am that gives freedom, can it be bound in any way? Then we can look at what is this game of illusion and freedom about. And keep it after the retribution for many of us in the sense that I am NOT the body-mind, that the body-mind is just a small aspect of my turn. I'm still seen like we keep looking at the reports from the body-mind to conform. But I am like the world waiting for the tiny black dot to become a transparent wall. Actually, I am ever-present, untouched by the obscene article. One of the key messages is that you are Consciousness. For you are not another painting in the constellation, very directly. And this is not an arrogant ego; many times a recognition is seemingly shadowed, overshadowed by these concepts of arrogance and unworthiness. These belong to a limited idea of the self. But when you reflect the reality of what you are, what is the only business that you will ever know? It is 'I am.' What you are is responsible, and it is your own experience. When this Consciousness is there, the world comes alive. When this Consciousness is not there, it is nothing. And yet, even that nothing is seen. That there is nothing, there is no-thing. It is we all set this way. Your Self is not coming and going; it is unchanging and untouched even by the presence of form. This is in phenomenal expression. Roots phenomena, the primordial vibration, and this is called the basis of which the rest of these things come alive. But all of this is also an aspect of you.

So sometimes we should wave you odd that, 'Oh, this is not my experience' or 'I am not there yet, it will come, I need to make a journey out of this.' But I am talking about your present reality. I am not speaking of something which will come to be. Present, we already are. Is it that you exist? 'I am' is undeniable. Because it is just undeniable that I am aware. I agree with the girl: present, unchanging reality now. What else is unchanging? What aware of cases now? The realm of existence is something unchanging. Say yes. Whether I mean that the sense of existence is there now in the realm of existence, in this the light of his existence, always welcomed the light. There's something unchanging in that. Third things we constantly see: the body seems to be constantly changing, thoughts seem to be constantly changing, how they came to be continuity, emotions and sensations, energy things to consider. Before you looking for support as a stable phenomena, then it must be the root phenomena, which is like maybe somebody like a dog with a just able to tempt. 'I am' that is only comes and goes in time. But ultimately for you, even though for the coming and going, that's when horizon so step when you together Megan speakers that 'I am.' But ultimately even this is actually the notice that they all email.

All of you here, you can never come across something called a 'person' as a discrete person. We never create a float, an entity like that, because there wasn't any. They visited you as unchanging Awareness. The words of existence, 'I am,' and the birth of it, 'I am,' with the birth of all nominal appearances. All that we taste and experience, I want to synthesize a word within Consciousness, from the screen of Consciousness and by the light of Consciousness. No entity called a person as we need to put analysis. It's Consciousness decides to play like this. If I, Consciousness, be what you want it to play is you are something limited. How do you know about it? Where do you see that? It is impossible to actually happen that the unlimited would become limited. You cannot actually happen. Then it must be a pretense, a game, pretend. How is it that Consciousness plays the game of pretend? With sort of this phenomena as well, in the limited sort of way, using that system could affect me. Something must weakly be with the invention of this energy construct, and the invention of the power to believe that this hot ice cream is hoping his relatives. It would just look impossible for you to add an 'X' into 'I' or 'I am.' What you do experience with life will be like that movie. It is impossible for 'I am' to attach a logic to itself.

I think that something happens in our life, someone comes and shouts at us, and I just on my anger is company clearly coming. But ideas and 'I am not angry,' 'I am not careful.' The rising of the sensation was there, a thing might happen, the thoughts are some samsara to leave. It is impossible to attach them to 'I am.' And how would you give yourself ugly? How would it be possible for Consciousness to order the limited entity for body-mind is, unless it has a duty to say 'I have something for the one'? When it is upon hitting, it identifies as a jiva. 'I am identifying as I am something.' The people such as Consciousness wanted to play this game in this way when it gave itself the power to believe what is energy, tangy energy constructs for odds. I think so, the normal steady for you embedded the mystical coming in which is limited. When if you order this, you will be nominated very quickly. The idea of a limited 'me' falls away.