राम
All Satsangs

Is Awareness and Knowing the Same? - 7th October 2016

October 7, 20169:5949 views

Saar (Essence)

Ananta clarifies that the person is merely a conceptual myth born from the power of belief. He guides the seeker to recognize that the same primal awareness present in deep sleep remains the only constant reality.

The person is just a belief, like the forbidden apple of knowledge, pretending to be 'I am something'.
There has never been a person; there is only awareness that knows both sleep and waking.
The same 'I' that knows the absence of everything in sleep is the one here now.

contemplative

awarenessknowingnessi ampersonhooddeep sleepbeliefconsciousnessnon-duality

Transcript

This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.

Ananta

You see, witnessing, yes, knowing is the same. You dummy, I'm seeing from the mind, from the phenomenal point of view would be... knowing means like to knowing the attributes of this object, that is the small 'k' knowing. And this witnessing is just knowing its existence in a way without necessarily knowing any attribute. So Witnessing capital 'W', Knowing capital 'K', and Awareness capital 'A', all are the same. Knowing small 'k' is to know our concept of something. Witnessing small 'w' is the phenomenal perceiving of something. Awareness, well, again, small 'a' is related to the mental knowing or mental awareness or conception knowing of something, or the physical perceiving of something. But what we are talking about is the Capitals, the Absolutes.

Ananta

So when the sages say knowingness, witnessing, the primal witnessing—see, I have stopped using that word so often because it gets confused with the phenomenal perceiving—so that would be like in the deep sleep, the one who knows there was nothing. Even though I am... I mean, and it knows it is the primal knowing. So when this I Am arises with the world, this is immediately a knowing that now something has come which was not there.

Seeker

Yes, but it felt like that the person also knows that. How the first person, or the product of this, later know? The person isn't the conceptual product present in I Am? So before coming to satsang, yes, and recognizing, being shown that you know the person is not there, before that, where the sense of the person was there, it felt like very logical because you still knew that there was nothing there even before something. I knew the whole thing, but I knew that I must be there to know that nothing. Nice. So it felt like the person knew there was nothing and now the person... like I knew my dream, I knew my sleep was not there. Yeah, it is not that there was a person there, and now after satsang there is no person here. Our experience has always been one there. Actually, there has been no person ever. This always only Awareness that is known to sleep and waking.

Seeker

Okay, um, yeah, so I just have to... yeah, then... so then like you just said, there was even when before satsang when the knowing was there that there was nothing, but I was there too. When I contemplated, then I find... but who was the I that was there? Yes, very good. Who was this I that was there? And because I guess I'm looking from the point of view again as a person, then I feel that I was there as, you know, the... you see how I was about it?

Ananta

No, no, don't worry. I was there and I knew in the sleep state there was nothing. Now this I that was there, what was personal about it?

Read more (7 more paragraphs) ↓
Seeker

Nothing.

Ananta

Nothing. So we cannot call it person.

Seeker

Yeah, yeah, exactly. So there was meaning... there was no world, there was no sense of I Am, no being, nothing. And yet it was... I mean, when it wakes, when we are there or experiencing there, you don't even miss anything. Every service since this, there is no lack, there is no idea of any loss. The confusion that comes for me is that, but how can you say I was there? You... yeah, you can say I was there because it admits for you. Is it? If I say there's another state in which you are, you see a hundred rainbows, she says, 'Is it you?' That is something you say, but I have not experienced that. I don't think there is such a state. Oh, but when I say about sleep, you say, 'Yes, of course.' So I went to sleep and I woke up. So we were not there in the most primal sense of existence as I Am, and yet to be able to say this itself means that there was an I which knows that even I Am was not there.

Seeker

Yeah, so but the same one is now also seeing. The same one that was there has to be here to behold, answer that question. But then when I see the same one now, I suddenly... the same one becomes a person. It feels like a person, you say. We move like a person, you know, Anthony. I mean, if I say just mentally like a question-answer, if I am, I know that it must be the Awareness which is talking. Keep it like experiential now. I'm trying to just not be a mental answer, and experientially I'm coming to a recognition that there is no person. So it always must be the same one all along. You can be this one, then became that one to him. Even if it became, it's the same one who begins this, became that. Something that... some tree for my things, there must be only one reality.

Seeker

So when we say that, oh, this person doesn't exist, the person doesn't exist, somehow when I try to understand the meaning that this person doesn't exist, meaning I who always am exist, not as I Am that time alone. The consciousness only there always is. And this person, when I feel that I'm not this, meaning doesn't exist in a sense, it has to be an idea or something which can be gone away. Of course, because I can't go away. I mean, I sit here and I'm knowing of my own existence always. Very good. So somehow this same original... I am saying calling it the original has come into a conclusion. The person is not concluding is a person. I, the original one, has become... putting out the power circuit. Okay, then confusing to you.

Ananta

So let's just break it up a bit so there's no confusion. In sleep state, no, we can say the being takes birth, consciousness takes birth, I Am. But beingness, being simple, listen to this. So now this sense I Am appears and it is the same I which is now 'am-ing' I Am. It is not another one. There are not two. Now some of you hear this, sometimes you put that sounds dual. It is not. It is I Am. It is not that there is an I and now there is another which... it is I itself, the dynamic aspect of itself which now appears as I Am.

Ananta

Now with the birth of this I Am-ness or the appearance of this I Am-ness comes the birth of all the powers that come along with it. There is the power of attention, there's the power of belief, there is a power of gravity, the power of electricity, the power of magnetism. It's all of these forces that come into play, you see. Now this, let's zero in on the power of belief. I Am, before it believes something, remains unassociated, just as I Am, abstract. Belief, that is the moment of biting the apple, the forbidden apple of knowledge, that it goes from this pure I Am-ness into pretending. Is it as if it is 'I am something'? When it is pretending as if it is 'I am something', that is what we call person. But just because it believed itself to be something doesn't mean it gave any tangible existence to this idea of the person. It is still only a belief, only an idea. So when it is said that you don't exist as a person, it means that you never actually existed. It was only a myth, only an idea. Just like the cat example, isn't it? The cat never existed.

The Thread Continues

These satsangs touch the same silence.